2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41561-021-00727-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-lived shallow slow-slip events on the Sunda megathrust

Abstract: Long-lived shallow slow-slip events on the Sunda megathrust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deformation, rupture behaviour and slip potential of plate boundary megathrusts at convergent margins are complex and vary greatly from one subduction zone to another (Nanayama et al 2003;Mallick et al 2021). Some megathrusts are poised to produce occasional great earthquakes separated by patchy moderate seismicity (e.g., Chile subduction zone) or frequent moderate to large earthquakes (e.g., Mexican subduction zone) and releases the stresses that builds up during the interseismic period due to continued plate convergence (Rajendran, et al 2007).…”
Section: Rationale For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The deformation, rupture behaviour and slip potential of plate boundary megathrusts at convergent margins are complex and vary greatly from one subduction zone to another (Nanayama et al 2003;Mallick et al 2021). Some megathrusts are poised to produce occasional great earthquakes separated by patchy moderate seismicity (e.g., Chile subduction zone) or frequent moderate to large earthquakes (e.g., Mexican subduction zone) and releases the stresses that builds up during the interseismic period due to continued plate convergence (Rajendran, et al 2007).…”
Section: Rationale For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurring/similar earthquakes are generally caused by repeated slip in small patches bounded by creeping aseismic regions and releases elastic energy accumulated on a locking fault during interseismic period (Peng et al 2010;Obra et al 2016). The interseismic slip rate de cit which is presumed to be based on the frictionally locked asperities that increases the kinematic coupling/locking between plates and promotes seismic subduction (Mallick et al 2021). Contrary interseismic creep indicates absence of frictional locking, lower stored strain and less chances for coseismic slip to trigger a great earthquake, but their interactions with adjacent faults/segments can make them dangerous (Mallick et al 2021;Igarashi and Kato, 2021;Lindsey, et al 2021).…”
Section: Rationale For the Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 15-year-long (1966-1981) SSE was proposed to explain the observations in the Banyak Islands, located above the rupture zone of the 2005 M w 8.6 earthquake (see also Tsang et al, 2015), although the 25 years gap between the two events challenges the existence of a causal link. Some of the long-term variations could however be more directly related to subsequent megathrust earthquakes: a 32-year long surface deformation anomaly was interpreted as an SSE in the shallow part of the plate interface, before the 1861 E M 8.5 megathrust earthquake (Mallick et al, 2021); the authors propose that this long duration SSE could have been triggered and sustained by elevated pore fluid pressure, and then stopped by subsequent drainage caused by the mainshock. In Japan, Hasegawa and Yoshida (2015), Heki and Mitsui (2013), Loveless and Meade (2016), Mavrommatis et al (2014), Mavrommatis et al (2015), and Yokota and Koketsu (2015) infer slip rate variations over 15 years along the Japan Trench before the 2011 Tohoku earthquake.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of findings from elsewhere (e.g. Mallick et al, 2021), it is also plausible that longer-lasting SSEs may also have been occurring on a multi-decadal timescale along the Kapiti Coast, which could have further reduced the rate of twentieth century relative sea-level rise. An alternate explanation for the shift in may relate to variability in the depth or distribution of plate coupling over time under Pāuatahanui, which may have resulted in changes in the sense of vertical land movement.…”
Section: Discussion Of Trend Estimationsmentioning
confidence: 97%