2019
DOI: 10.3390/min9010059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Lived Mantle Plume and Polyphase Evolution of Palaeoproterozoic PGE Intrusions in the Fennoscandian Shield

Abstract: The NE Fennoscandian Shield comprises the Northern Belt in Finland and the Southern Belt in Karelia. They host mafic-ultramafic layered Cu-Ni-Cr and Pt-Pd-bearing intrusions. Precise U-Pb and Sm-Nd analyses indicate the 130-Ma evolution of these intrusions, with major events at 2.53, 2.50, 2.45, and 2.40 Ga. Barren phases were dated at 2.53 Ga for orthopyroxenites and olivine gabbro in the Fedorovo-Pansky massif. PGE-bearing phases of gabbronorites (Pechenga, Fedorovo-Pansky, Monchetundra massifs) and norites … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to geochronological and Nd-Sr isotope data, rocks of the Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa complex seemed to have a common anomalous mantle source with Paleoproterozoic layered intrusions of the Baltic Shield (Figure 9). The obtained data comply with the known isotope-geochemical characteristics of ore-bearing layered intrusions in the northeastern Baltic Shield [40,43,46]. The model age of rocks from the Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa complex varied from 2.8 Ga to 3.3 Ga and corresponded with T DM for rocks in the East-Scandinavian Large Igneous Province [46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to geochronological and Nd-Sr isotope data, rocks of the Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa complex seemed to have a common anomalous mantle source with Paleoproterozoic layered intrusions of the Baltic Shield (Figure 9). The obtained data comply with the known isotope-geochemical characteristics of ore-bearing layered intrusions in the northeastern Baltic Shield [40,43,46]. The model age of rocks from the Kandalaksha-Kolvitsa complex varied from 2.8 Ga to 3.3 Ga and corresponded with T DM for rocks in the East-Scandinavian Large Igneous Province [46].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In general, using sulfides as geochronometers provides positive results for a number of commercially valued objects of the Baltic Shield [42]. The model Sm-Nd age of these gabbroids was close to 3.3 Ga (Table 4), which is typical of the Paleoproterozoic ore-magmatic system of the Baltic Shield [43]. Rutile, garnet, plagioclase, clinopyroxene, and whole rocks from metaanorthosites of the Kandalaksha massif (sample 225/1) displayed the age of 1886 ± 37 Ma on the Sm-Nd plot in isochron coordinates (Figure 8b, Table 4).…”
Section: Results Of U-pb and Sm-nd Datingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Sm-Nd age of rocks in the rhythmically layered series of the complex is 2485 ± 77 Ma (whole-rock isochron) and 2475 ± 38Ma (mineral isochron). It coincides with the age of layered intrusions in the Baltic Shield [11,12,15,36,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94]. The model Sm-Nd age (TDM) of the analyzed samples is close to 2.7-2.8 Ga.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The obtained isotope-geochronological data combined with results of previous geochemical, petrological, and mineralogical studies of the complex [43][44][45][46][47][72][73][74] allow referring it to the vast Paleoproterozoic East Scandinavian LIP, which is associated with rich deposits of strategic mineral raw materials (i.e., Cr, Cu-Ni-Co and PGE) [1][2][3][4][5][6][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]41,42,54,87,[89][90][91][92]94].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally believed that the formation of PGE mineralization in most Russian Paleoproterozoic layered intrusions is related to prolonged igneous activity in response to a long-lived mantle plume [73] affecting the Kola Craton for more than 50 Ma, which is mainly based on ID-TIMS U-Pb age dating [15,49]. This interpretation is generally at odds with the current paradigm of relatively short-lived mantle plume magmatism and the duration of cooling of basaltic magma chambers, such as the Bushveld Complex, which crystallized in less than 1 Ma [74].…”
Section: The Problem Of the Duration Of Crystallization Of Intrusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%