2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.0c00161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Lived Gold Single-Atom Junctions Formed by a Flexible Probe for Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Applications

Abstract: Flexible probes have shown promise in improving resolution and sensitivity in various scanning probe microscopy based imaging and spectroscopy techniques. However, it has not been utilized in scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) based break-junction (BJ) and fixed-junction (FJ) techniques. In this report, flexible STM tips are facilely fabricated by using goldcoated quartz nanopipettes. The feasibility of using conductive nanopipettes as STM tips is demonstrated by using the STM BJ technique to repeatedly form … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Au‐coated nanopipette electrode (NPE) is used as the tip of a home‐built STM on a gold substrate as described elsewhere. [ 14–17 ] The NPE is fabricated by sequentially depositing chromium and gold on a laser‐pulled quartz nanopipette (see Section S1.1, Supporting Information), and the produced electrode possesses a conducting exterior surface, an open channel and a long shank length (6.1 ± 0.1 mm) with a high flexibility [ 14 ] (k NP ≈ 0.13 N m −1 , see atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurement of the NPE spring constant in Section S2.1, Supporting Information). The optical image of a typical NPE and its SEM images of the tip apex are displayed in the inset of Figure 1a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A Au‐coated nanopipette electrode (NPE) is used as the tip of a home‐built STM on a gold substrate as described elsewhere. [ 14–17 ] The NPE is fabricated by sequentially depositing chromium and gold on a laser‐pulled quartz nanopipette (see Section S1.1, Supporting Information), and the produced electrode possesses a conducting exterior surface, an open channel and a long shank length (6.1 ± 0.1 mm) with a high flexibility [ 14 ] (k NP ≈ 0.13 N m −1 , see atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurement of the NPE spring constant in Section S2.1, Supporting Information). The optical image of a typical NPE and its SEM images of the tip apex are displayed in the inset of Figure 1a.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend is similar to the measurements of gold single‐atom junctions using both types of probes. [ 14 ] Figure 1c shows the molecular conductance distribution generated by statistically compiling thousands of conductance decay traces without data selection. For both measurements, a conductance peak appears at ≈10 −4.3 G 0 , which is consistent with the reported single‐molecule conductance value of octanedithiol molecule.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A typical example is the application of different lengths of tips in STM‐BJ measurement. Molecular junctions formed by STM methods are usually unstable at room temperature [33] . In addition to reported chemical methods, some physical methods, such as flexible electrodes, can be regarded as a buffer, which can significantly improve the formation rate of the single‐molecule junction and reduce noise.…”
Section: The Influence Factors Of Microelectrodes On Molecular Junctimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular electronics aims at investigating single molecules at electrical junctions for fabricating electronic devices, which has been extensively investigated (Cui, 2001;Choi and Mody, 2009;Herrer et al, 2018). A variety of methods have been developed to measure the electrical properties of single molecules by constructing metal-moleculemetal junctions, including scanning probes techniques such as scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) techniques (Xu and Tao, 2003;Haiss et al, 2006;Venkataraman et al, 2006;Chen et al, 2020;Yu et al, 2020), conducting atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Cui, 2001), mechanically controlled break junctions (MCBJ) (Reed et al, 1997;Smit et al, 2002), and nanoparticle dimers (Dadosh et al, 2005;Fernandez et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%