2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Lived Binding of Sox2 to DNA Predicts Cell Fate in the Four-Cell Mouse Embryo

Abstract: Transcription factor (TF) binding to DNA is fundamental for gene regulation. However, it remains unknown how the dynamics of TF-DNA interactions change during cell-fate determination in vivo. Here, we use photo-activatable FCS to quantify TF-DNA binding in single cells of developing mouse embryos. In blastocysts, the TFs Oct4 and Sox2, which control pluripotency, bind DNA more stably in pluripotent than in extraembryonic cells. By contrast, in the four-cell embryo, Sox2 engages in more long-lived interactions … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
191
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
10
191
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FCS is particularly useful for the analysis of diffusion properties of very mobile factors and can be used to gain more detailed information than those obtained by photobleaching approaches. The single‐molecule sensitivity and the microsecond to a few seconds time resolution of FCS have for example allowed the dynamic repartitioning of DNA‐binding factors driven by physiological epigenetic changes, provided quantitative insights into chromatin‐binding dynamics of the Polycomb complex or participated to characterizing protein network dynamics in live cells (Steffen et al , 2013; Wachsmuth et al , 2015; White et al , 2016). Fluorescence intensity correlation analyses describe several physicochemical parameters of labelled factors, such as the total number of diffusing molecules ( N tot ), their apparent diffusion coefficient ( D ), and their apparent molecular weight (MW A ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FCS is particularly useful for the analysis of diffusion properties of very mobile factors and can be used to gain more detailed information than those obtained by photobleaching approaches. The single‐molecule sensitivity and the microsecond to a few seconds time resolution of FCS have for example allowed the dynamic repartitioning of DNA‐binding factors driven by physiological epigenetic changes, provided quantitative insights into chromatin‐binding dynamics of the Polycomb complex or participated to characterizing protein network dynamics in live cells (Steffen et al , 2013; Wachsmuth et al , 2015; White et al , 2016). Fluorescence intensity correlation analyses describe several physicochemical parameters of labelled factors, such as the total number of diffusing molecules ( N tot ), their apparent diffusion coefficient ( D ), and their apparent molecular weight (MW A ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, recent experiments have shown that there is variable intercellular expression of proteins as early as the four-cell stage of a mouse embryo, even though the separation of fates into primitive endoderm, epiblast and trophectoderm takes place at the 16-to 32-cell transition (Goolam et al, 2016;White et al, 2016b). Furthermore, by measuring the binding dynamics of transcription factors to DNA, it was shown that Sox2, a transcription factor controlling pluripotency, exhibits much longer binding to DNA in specific blastomeres of the four-cell embryo; these blastomeres with longer-lived Sox2-DNA complexes later contributed to the pluripotent cells of the inner cell mass.…”
Section: Breaking Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been observed that even before distinct lineages have been determined, Sox2 binding dynamics differ between four-cell blastocytes, and those cells with more long-lived Sox2 binding contribute more pluripotent progeny downstream (White et al 2016). Single-molecule tracking of fluorescently tagged p53 and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) show that, at transcriptionally active domains, TFs bind transiently (<1 sec dwell time on DNA), with only a small fraction (<8%) engaged in productive binding (∼5 sec dwell time on DNA) (Morisaki et al 2014).…”
Section: Tf Search Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%