2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long life small CANDLE-HTGRs with thorium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The plant showed success with the use of a thorium fuel in a light water reactor (LWR) [3]. In addition, the use of mixed thorium / uranium oxide has been employed in several reactor types such as in prismatic and pebble bed HTGRs, BWRs, LWRs, and LMFBRs [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], but mainly focused on the use of thorium-based fuel in pebble bed HTGRs and prismatic HTGRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plant showed success with the use of a thorium fuel in a light water reactor (LWR) [3]. In addition, the use of mixed thorium / uranium oxide has been employed in several reactor types such as in prismatic and pebble bed HTGRs, BWRs, LWRs, and LMFBRs [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], but mainly focused on the use of thorium-based fuel in pebble bed HTGRs and prismatic HTGRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This burnup value was higher compared with the burnup value obtained in the previous studies, for example, for the Germany THTR-300 pebble bed reactor with 300 MWe using uranium and 232 Th fuel which has burnup value approximately 110 GWD/T [2]. In addition to that, compared with other related studies about the use of thorium in the HTGR, such as a block type Fort St. Vrain reactor with 330 MWe power which has 100 GWD/T burnup value [3] and a 30 MWt block type HTGR with a transitional fuel composition using ( 235 U, 232 Th)O 2 with burnup value as 120 GDW/T [4], this simplified pebble bed reactor with the optimized thorium fuel configuration has higher burnup value. However, compared with the reference design case [1], burnup values of this Design A with thorium were 4.5% higher than those of Reference Design 2 using only uranium.…”
Section: Parametric Surveys To Determine the Optimal Fuel Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been performed to examine the use of thorium as a nuclear fuel, but additional time and effort are needed to make its use on the industrial scale possible. In some studies about the use of thorium in the HTGR [2][3][4], they have used combination of 233 U and 232 Th to improve the burnup performance of the reactor. However, because 233 U could not be found naturally, therefore in the meantime, using natural thorium with existing technology, for example, as a fertile material mixed with the existing uranium dioxide fuel ( 232 Th, 238 U -235 U)O 2 , which is going to be performed in this study, is one way to extend the nuclear horizon by reducing the level of natural uranium utilization meanwhile trying to keep or even increase the burnup characteristics of the reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages inherent in such reactor type are high fuel utilization efficiency and no need for dedicated procedures to enrich the fuel for the feed region, as well as increased reactor safety. Tasks were solved based on the above concept using various approaches to and descriptions of the phenomenon in question, including nuclear combustion wave (Pavlovich et al 2008), candle (Ismail et al 2007), criticality wave (Van Dam 2000), traveling wave (Gilleland et al 2016), etc. For example, (Van Dam 2000 deals with studying the stability of the nuclear combustion wave mode at the stage when the reactor already reaches the steady-state condition with constant values of the neutron flux in the system and the wave propagation velocity, as well as with studying the reactor behavior in conditions of particular external disturbances in neutron fields and of the fuel heterogeneity in the form of the fuel local initial enrichment in fissionable isotopes on the neutron fission wave propagation path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%