1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1989.hed22904239.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐latency Auditory Event Related Potentials in Migraine

Abstract: The pathophysiology of migraine and its associated perceptual symptoms remains controversial. We recorded long-latency auditory event related potentials (AEPs) in 30 unmedicated patients with common migraine, and compared them to 20 controls. 1,000 and 3,000 Hz tones were presented in an 80:20 ratio at 75 dB SL. 200 responses were recorded and replicated from Cz-A1 + A2, with filter band-pass of 1-100 Hz, analysis time of 1,000 ms., and interstimulus interval of 1.1 second. N100, P200, and N200 ERP components … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
38
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Both factors might have influenced the latencies and amplitudes of ERP components. The impact of chronic anti-convulsive medication on ERPs has not been systematically investigated as yet, but impairment of reaction velocity is a core side effect of this kind of medication and a down slowing of ERP components has been described for medicated epilepsy patients (Drake et al, 1986;Triantafyllou et al, 1992;Verleger et al, 1997). However, the peak latency of the MMN observed in the current sample does not differ notably from MMN latencies reported for healthy subjects when the same kind of deviance was applied (Todd et al, 2000).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studycontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Both factors might have influenced the latencies and amplitudes of ERP components. The impact of chronic anti-convulsive medication on ERPs has not been systematically investigated as yet, but impairment of reaction velocity is a core side effect of this kind of medication and a down slowing of ERP components has been described for medicated epilepsy patients (Drake et al, 1986;Triantafyllou et al, 1992;Verleger et al, 1997). However, the peak latency of the MMN observed in the current sample does not differ notably from MMN latencies reported for healthy subjects when the same kind of deviance was applied (Todd et al, 2000).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studycontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Conversely, concordant results came from the few studies of cortical long-latency auditory evoked potentials, which did not show significant differences between migraineurs and controls with regard to N1, P2 and N2 component latency or amplitude [22,61].…”
Section: Auditory Cortex Response Patterns In Migrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were reported normal interictal latencies [22, 39, 57-59], increased latencies (especially for wave V) [60,61], in particular during the attack [57,58], and inter-aural asymmetries [60], especially in migraine with aura [62]. A negative correlation was also described between discomfort caused by low-intensity stimulations (55 dB) and wave IV-V amplitude [22].…”
Section: Auditory Cortex Response Patterns In Migrainementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resistance of the electrodes was kept below 5 kohm. The analog filter band pass was 1-100 Hz (Drake et al, 1989). For each stimulus, an epoch of 500-ms duration including a 100-ms pre-stimulus period was extracted from the continuous EEG.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%