1999
DOI: 10.1006/gcen.1998.7184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long Days and Thyroxine Program American Tree Sparrows for Seasonality: Evidence for Temporal Flexibility of the Breeding Season of Euthyroid Females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After prolonged exposure to long days, however, GnRH immunoreactivity may decrease substantially in cells and axonal fi bers with the development of photorefractoriness in some species [Dawson et al, 1985;Foster et al, 1987;Hahn and Ball, 1995;Deviche et al, 2000] but not others [Foster et al, 1988;Bentley et al, 2003]. Decreases in overall GnRH content of the brain, as determined by radioimmunoassay between photosensitive or photostimulated and photorefractory phases, are consistent with this pattern in species that show large changes in immunoreactivity [Nicholls et al, 1988;Bluhm et al, 1991;Dawson, 1998;Wilson and Reinert, 1999;Dawson et al, 2002]. Because photorefractoriness might be the most important means of controlling the duration of reproductive responsiveness and length of the breeding season at high latitudes, we expected differences in the extent to which photo-induced inactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is manifested through reductions in GnRH, and that these differences might correspond to differences in the capacity for reproductive fl exibility Hahn et al, 1997;Dawson et al, 2001].…”
Section: Effects Of Long Days On Gnrh Immunoreactivitysupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After prolonged exposure to long days, however, GnRH immunoreactivity may decrease substantially in cells and axonal fi bers with the development of photorefractoriness in some species [Dawson et al, 1985;Foster et al, 1987;Hahn and Ball, 1995;Deviche et al, 2000] but not others [Foster et al, 1988;Bentley et al, 2003]. Decreases in overall GnRH content of the brain, as determined by radioimmunoassay between photosensitive or photostimulated and photorefractory phases, are consistent with this pattern in species that show large changes in immunoreactivity [Nicholls et al, 1988;Bluhm et al, 1991;Dawson, 1998;Wilson and Reinert, 1999;Dawson et al, 2002]. Because photorefractoriness might be the most important means of controlling the duration of reproductive responsiveness and length of the breeding season at high latitudes, we expected differences in the extent to which photo-induced inactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is manifested through reductions in GnRH, and that these differences might correspond to differences in the capacity for reproductive fl exibility Hahn et al, 1997;Dawson et al, 2001].…”
Section: Effects Of Long Days On Gnrh Immunoreactivitysupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Although molt was well underway in this individual, its gonads remained large and in this respect its response to long days was more similar to that of a photostimulated bird, with suffi cient GnRH release to elicit high plasma LH levels and to maintain an active reproductive system. The existence of 'unusual' responses such as this in individuals of other species including the American tree sparrow [Wilson and Reinert, 1999] and European starling [Dawson, 1991a] which unequivocally develop absolute photorefractoriness may, like the responder/non-responder populations of deer mice and voles [Desjardins et al, 1986;Nelson, 1987], refl ect the presence of potentially heritable natural variation in the GnRH system. Phenotypic differences in photoresponsiveness, persistence of photosensitive and photostimulated states and the associated extent to which GnRH synthesis, storage and release are modulated over extended periods of the year could be selected for as long as birds able to take advantage of resources outside of the normal window for breeding produce more progeny than those in which inactivation of the GnRH system precludes a reproductive response.…”
Section: Evolutionary Signifi Cance Of Individual Variability In Respmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pineal gland, which exerts strong antigonadal influence in mammals (Gorman et al, 2001;Zucker, 2001) and the tropical baya weaver (Balasubramanyam and Saxena, 1973), does not seem to be involved (ChandolaSaklani et al, 1988(ChandolaSaklani et al, , 1990bPant and Chandola-Saklani, 1993). Thyroid hormones have been shown to exert inhibitory effects on gonadal development and photoneuroendocrine response in passerine birds, including the spotted munia (Chandola et al, 1974;Chaturvedi and Thapliyal, 1979;Dawson et al, 2001;Follett and Nicolls, 1988;Kar and Chandola, 1985;Pant and Chandola-Saklani, 1995;Thapliyal, 1978;Wilson and Reinert, 1999). Results of experiments being reported elsewhere (Chandola-Saklani et al, 2004) indicate that brief exposure to thyroxine in the winter can phase-shift the breeding phase so as to coincide with the monsoon period in spotted munia held in LL.…”
Section: Reprintsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Nicholls et al (1988) and Wilson (1997) suggested that both the stimulation of reproduction and subsequent programming of PR occur by the interaction of thyroid hormones and long day length early in photostimulation. This model, developed using starlings and tree sparrows, suggests that PR is programmed by the interaction of thyroxine and long days (Nicholls et al, 1988;Wilson and Reinert, 1999;Dawson, 2001;Wilson, 2001;Mishra et al, 2004) and that programming occurs as early as 1d (Dawson, 2001) or 7d (Dawson et. al, 1985) but within a few weeks of long day exposure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%