2024
DOI: 10.3390/diseases12050095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long COVID in Children, Adults, and Vulnerable Populations: A Comprehensive Overview for an Integrated Approach

Valeria Calcaterra,
Sara Zanelli,
Andrea Foppiani
et al.

Abstract: Long COVID affects both children and adults, including subjects who experienced severe, mild, or even asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We have provided a comprehensive overview of the incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of persistent COVID-19 symptoms in both children and adults, encompassing vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and oncological patients. Our objective is to emphasize the critical significance of adopting an integrated approach for the early detection and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 265 publications
(391 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These plans may face challenges such as funding limitations, variability in biomarker effectiveness across diverse populations, and potential delays in clinical trial outcomes. To mitigate these issues, we recommend prioritizing funding for high-impact research areas, using adaptive clinical trial designs, and promoting international collaborations to increase the diversity of clinical trial participants [ 115 , 116 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plans may face challenges such as funding limitations, variability in biomarker effectiveness across diverse populations, and potential delays in clinical trial outcomes. To mitigate these issues, we recommend prioritizing funding for high-impact research areas, using adaptive clinical trial designs, and promoting international collaborations to increase the diversity of clinical trial participants [ 115 , 116 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%