2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/831252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long Channel Carbon Nanotube as an Alternative to Nanoscale Silicon Channels in Scaled MOSFETs

Abstract: Long channel carbon nanotube transistor (CNT) can be used to overcome the high electric field effects in nanoscale length silicon channel. When maximum electric field is reduced, the gate of a field-effect transistor (FET) is able to gain control of the channel at varying drain bias. The device performance of a zigzag CNTFET with the same unit area as a nanoscale silicon metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) channel is assessed qualitatively. The drain characteristic of CNTFET and MOSFET d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interconnects also play a key role as channels reach nanometer scale and resistance surge takes on an increasing importance [2]. Carbon-based allotropes offer a distinct advantage in a variety of applications [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures restricting carrier motion in only one direction, reducing scattering for enhanced mobility [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interconnects also play a key role as channels reach nanometer scale and resistance surge takes on an increasing importance [2]. Carbon-based allotropes offer a distinct advantage in a variety of applications [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are one-dimensional (1D) nanostructures restricting carrier motion in only one direction, reducing scattering for enhanced mobility [6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations in this work are carried out for the 16 nm manufacturing processes. In the following, device model framework of our previous work [7,[16][17][18][19] is extended for the simulation and analysis of GNRFET and MOSFET at 16 nm node. Circuit-level models of GNRFET are benchmarked against MOSFET.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have selected other published works on low-dimensional FETs to fairly assess the device performance of the proposed AlSi 3 FET. The selected published models include co-decorated SiNR FET [ 21 ], 27-ASiNR FET [ 20 ], Si nanowire (SiNW) FET [ 34 ], Si thin sheet FET [ 35 ], carbon nanotube (CNT) FET [ 36 ], graphene nanoribbon (GNR) FET [ 37 ], black phosphorene (BP) FET [ 38 ], and monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) FET [ 39 ]. To concisely compare the device performance metrics, the comparisons are presented as bar graphs as shown in Fig 6 .…”
Section: Performances Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where C E and C Q are the electrostatic gate coupling capacitance of the gate oxide and the quantum capacitance of the gated SWCNT, respectively [ 30 - 33 ]. Figure 2 shows the I - V characteristics of a bare SWCNT FET for different gate voltages without any PBS and glucose concentration that is based on Equation 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%