2002
DOI: 10.1006/icar.2002.6875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long- and Short-Term Photometric Behavior of Comet Hyakutake (1996 B2)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although sometimes it is difficult to choose between a single-peak phase profile or its double-peak first multiple (e.g. Schleicher et al 1991;Schleicher & Osip 2002), to our knowledge a symmetric multipeak shape has never been unambiguously claimed. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although sometimes it is difficult to choose between a single-peak phase profile or its double-peak first multiple (e.g. Schleicher et al 1991;Schleicher & Osip 2002), to our knowledge a symmetric multipeak shape has never been unambiguously claimed. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The existence of a water ice halo has been postulated long ago (Huebner 1966;Delsemme 1969) to explain the large water production rates measured in some comets with nuclei too small for such production. A recent example is Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake) with a Q(H 2 O) of ≈3 × 10 29 mol/s (Schleicher & Osip 2002) and a nucleus diameter of 3 km (Harmon et al 1997). Hanner et al (1981) showed that dirty ice grains would have very short lifetimes at 1 AU from the Sun, of the order of a few hundreds of seconds, depending on their size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No trends are evident with either parameter, so we conclude that this primary measure of Wild 2's composition has remained constant over time and with distance from the Sun, an unsurprising result given the similar orbital behavior of each of the carbon-bearing species. As discussed recently in papers about Comets Hyakutake (1996 B2) (Schleicher and Osip, 2002) and 19P/Borrelly (Schleicher et al, 2003), a direct comparison of abundance ratios with the taxonomic classes determined from the A' Hearn et al (1995) database must be made with caution, because of changes in filter reduction coefficients related to our improved understanding of the shape and extent of the wings of the C 2 and C 3 emission bands (see Appendix A and Farnham et al, 2000). To first order, these changes will result in new C 2 -to-CN ratios ∼ 17% larger than would have been computed previously, but the specific shift also depends somewhat on the dust-to-gas ratio of a particular comet.…”
Section: Compositionmentioning
confidence: 98%