2002
DOI: 10.1080/00779950209544373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐ and short‐run determinants of the demand for money in New Zealand: A cointegration analysis

Abstract: The existence of a stable demand for money is very important for the conduct of monetary policy even in this new era of inflation targeting. It is argued that previous work on the demand for money in New Zealand has been either not very satisfactory in a number of ways or outdated. This paper examines the long-run determinants of the demand for M3 employing the Johansen cointegration technique and quarterly data for the period 1988:1-2002:2. This paper finds, inter alia, that the demand for money is cointegrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It implies that depreciation of Pakistani rupee results into decline of real money demand. Our findings on this relationship are similar to those by Hye et al (2009), Suliman and Dafaalla (2011) and Valadkhani (2008). This might be due to the strength of wealth effect versus substitution effect in the economy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…It implies that depreciation of Pakistani rupee results into decline of real money demand. Our findings on this relationship are similar to those by Hye et al (2009), Suliman and Dafaalla (2011) and Valadkhani (2008). This might be due to the strength of wealth effect versus substitution effect in the economy.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Siklos (1995aSiklos ( , 1995b examined the cointegrating links between M3, expected inflation and short term interest rates (the difference between NZ and US rates) over the 1981-1994 period and attained implausibly high income elasticities varying between 2 to 6. The income elasticities attained by Choi and Oxley (2004) and Valadkhani (2002) also seem unexpectedly high at around 1.7 and 1.5, respectively. An income elasticity estimate that is more in line with expectations was provided by Razzak (2001) who found the income elasticity of monetary base to be around unity over the 1988-1997 period while asserting that the correlation between money and real output is stronger than that between money and inflation.…”
Section: The Case Of New Zealandmentioning
confidence: 99%