Loneliness in Primary Care Patients: A Prevalence Study

Abstract

PURPOSE Loneliness has important health consequences. Little is known, however, about loneliness in primary care patient populations. This study describes the prevalence of loneliness in patients presenting for primary care and associations with self-reported demographic factors, health care utilization, and healthrelated quality of life. METHODS We conducted cross-sectional surveys of adults presenting for routine care to outpatient primary care practices in 2 diverse practice-based research networks. The 3-item University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale was utilized to determine loneliness. RESULTS The prevalence of loneliness was 20% (246/1,235). Loneliness prevalence was inversely associated with age (P <.01) and less likely in those who were married (P <.01) or employed (P <.01). Loneliness was more common in those with lower health status (P <.01), including when adjusting for employment and relationship status (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07). Primary care visits (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.03-1.10), urgent care/emergency department visits (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.38), and hospitalizations (OR = 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31) were associated with loneliness status. There was no significant difference in rates of loneliness between sexes (P = .08), racial categories (P = .57), or rural and urban respondents (P = .42). CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that loneliness is common in primary care patients and is associated with adverse health consequences including poorer health status and greater health care utilization. Further work is needed to understand the value of screening for and using interventions to treat loneliness in primary care.

Changes in substance use among young adults during a respiratory disease pandemic

“… 10 We present both continuous loneliness scores (range, 3–9) as a sum of individually answered questions, as well as a dichotomized loneliness variable where the continuous loneliness score was greater or equal to 6, similar to other reports. 11 The higher UCLA Loneliness Scale scores indicate greater degrees of loneliness. 10 …”

The relationship between sense of a life worth living and local self‐governance: A cross‐sectional study

“…To measure citizens’ perceptions of and behaviors related to their health and personal lives, we asked them various questions, based on the previous research, about their perception of sense of life worth living . We also asked them about their educational and exercise habits, whether they had a primary care physician, their health management, and their relationships with neighbors (Table ) . Responses were obtained on a four‐point Likert scale from “not at all” to “strongly agree,” except for the questions pertaining to having a primary care physician, sex, age, place of birth, and participation in local self‐governance.…”

The young Australian loneliness survey Understanding loneliness in adolescence and young adulthood

“…A recent review of loneliness across the lifespan indicated that the rate of loneliness can range from 11-20% for adolescents (12-15 years old) to 20-71% for young adults (15-21 years), significantly more than other age groups [8] . However, there is variability in the prevalence rate across studies [29] and this may relate to how many researchers often employ a single-item approach to measure loneliness severity [30][31][32]29,33,9,34] or a brief approach consisting of three to four items (i.e., [35][36][37][38] ).…”