2010
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/22/18/185704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

London penetration depth in the tight binding approximation: orthorhombic distortion and oxygen isotope effects in cuprates

Abstract: We present a simple derivation of an expression for the superfluid density n(s) α 1/λ(2) in superconductors with the tight binding energy dispersion. The derived expression is discussed in detail because of its distinction from the known expressions for ordinary superconductors with parabolic energy dispersion. We apply this expression for the experimental data analysis of the isotope effect in London penetration depth parameter λ in the BiSrCuO and YBaCuO family compounds near optimal doping, taking into acco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore we approximate the superconducting gap in the form ∆ k = ∆ 0 (cos k x a − cos k y a) /2. The magnitude of ∆ 0 ≈ 30meV is obtained from the temperature dependencies of the nuclear relaxation rate [24] and superfluid density [25] for Y Ba 2 Cu 3 O 7 . The energy dispersion is given by (5) and we employ the following minimal set of effective hoping parameters (in meV): t The calculated imaginary part of susceptibility in the normal phase for T = 100K is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Comparison To Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore we approximate the superconducting gap in the form ∆ k = ∆ 0 (cos k x a − cos k y a) /2. The magnitude of ∆ 0 ≈ 30meV is obtained from the temperature dependencies of the nuclear relaxation rate [24] and superfluid density [25] for Y Ba 2 Cu 3 O 7 . The energy dispersion is given by (5) and we employ the following minimal set of effective hoping parameters (in meV): t The calculated imaginary part of susceptibility in the normal phase for T = 100K is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Comparison To Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the penetration depth λ should display an anisotropy that is directly related to the superconducting order parameter. To make predictions for our proposed gap state, we calculate the penetration depth from the current-current correlator as follows 39,40 : Assuming that contributions from individual bands ν at the Fermi level simply sum up in the correlator 41 , we obtain for the current direction i The corresponding result from a single band calculation is given by…”
Section: Penetration Depth Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6) for ≈ 10 6 k points as in the calculation of the susceptibility in the superconducting state, we set T c = 9 K and use a mean-field-like T dependence of the superconducting order parameter, setting ∆ k = g(k)∆ 0 tanh(1.76 · T c /T − 1). 40 In the inset of Fig. 8 we show the result for the two eigenvalues of the superfluid density tensor, ∝ 1/λ(T ) 2 , corresponding to current in the x and y directions, respectively.…”
Section: Penetration Depth Anisotropymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When calculating the London depth λ the Fourier transform of the vector potential A q is to be considered in the long wavelength limit: q = 0 [40,41]. Following [42], for simplicity, we direct the vector potential along the x axis, but, in contrast to [42], we do not expand factors (10) in powers of A x q=0 . Retaining factor (10) in an exponential form, we transform operators in the Hamiltonian of SFM from the Wannier to the quasi-momentum representation.…”
Section: The London Penetration Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%