Lokale Ökosysteme sozialer Innovation verstehen und gestalten

Domanski, Dmitri; Kaletka, Christoph

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18532-9_17

Cited by 8 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While examining how social innovations and policies interact, we discover mutual relationships and interdependencies that vary across cases and change over time in relation to the evolution of policies and in relation to the stages of social innovations [7,15]. The main hindering and furthering influences from policies and political frameworks on social innovation have been analyzed by the SIMRA project but have already been mentioned in earlier works [15,17,18,48,49].…”

Section: Public Governance and Social Innovationmentioning

confidence: 94%

Social Innovation, Societal Change, and the Role of Policies

Lukesch

Ludvig

Slee³

et al. 2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Political frameworks and policies have a strong influence on the institutional ecosystem and on governance patterns, which in turn shape the operational space of civil society initiatives. This article aims to explore the social and institutional conditions and policy initiatives that foster or hinder social innovation and the pathways leading from social innovation to institutional change through to actual impacts on policies and political frameworks, in order to understand how policymakers can encourage and enable social innovation. The article builds on an extensive empirical background to develop a heuristic model to facilitate decision making for a policy environment propitious for the emergence of social innovation. The resulting model sets up a triadic configuration of (i) a committed core of key actors, (ii) the benevolent shadow of hierarchy represented by public actors, and (iii) multifunctional and malleable intermediary support structures for a successful development of social innovation initiatives. The model is discussed and validated by reference to three in-depth case studies from differing institutional settings. We conclude that policy should recognize that social innovation will achieve most when the triadic relationships between the state, intermediary organizations, and local actors are working together synergistically.

show abstract

Section: Public Governance and Social Innovationmentioning

confidence: 94%

Social Innovation, Societal Change, and the Role of Policies

Lukesch

Ludvig

Slee³

et al. 2020

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In line with these strategic considerations of its societal change potentials, questions arise on how SI spreads, how it can be stimulated, and how favourable SI "ecosystems" can be created (Cameron 2011;Biggeri, Testi, and Bellucci 2017;Moulaert et al 2017;Howaldt, Kaletka, and Schröder 2017a;Domanski and Kaletka 2018). Similar to the innovation systems developed to stimulate technological innovation, regional development and sustainability transitions (Hekkert et al 2007), this second-order mode of SI activity seeks to create the conditions and support structures (Oh et al 2016, 3) for it to flourish.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: an empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations

Pel

Wittmayer

Dorland

et al. 2019

Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social innovation is on the rise as a mode of governance through which to address societal challenges. Seeking to empower SI initiatives, researchers and policy makers are concerned with the development of supportive "ecosystems". This concept usefully calls attention to the distributed nature of SI agency, but many questions remain on the kinds of network constellations involved. This contribution unpacks the "SI ecosystems" concept, specifying how the empowerment afforded through SI networks rests on (1) local embedding, (2) transnational connectivity and (3) discursive resonance. Charting the variety of network constellations as studied in an international comparison of 20 transnational SI networks, a typology of SI ecosystems is constructed. Distinguishing five SI ecosystem ideal-types ranging from loosely integrated and locally focused co-creation hubs to globally connected and widely resonating political movements, the typology informs a differentiated approach to their understanding and development.

show abstract

Soziale Innovation Weltweit: Ergebnisse des Global Mapping im Projekt SI-DRIVE

Schröder¹

2018

Soziale Innovationen Lokal Gestalten

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lokale Ökosysteme sozialer Innovation verstehen und gestalten

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Social Innovation, Societal Change, and the Role of Policies

Social Innovation, Societal Change, and the Role of Policies

Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: an empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations

Soziale Innovation Weltweit: Ergebnisse des Global Mapping im Projekt SI-DRIVE

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About