2012
DOI: 10.1007/s13163-012-0104-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Łojasiewicz exponent of families of ideals, Rees mixed multiplicities and Newton filtrations

Abstract: Abstract. We give an expression for the Lojasiewicz exponent of a wide class of n-tuples of ideals (I 1 , . . . , I n ) in O n using the information given by a fixed Newton filtration. In order to obtain this expression we consider a reformulation of Lojasiewicz exponents in terms of Rees mixed multiplicities. As a consequence, we obtain a wide class of semi-weighted homogeneous functions (C n , 0) → (C, 0) for which the Lojasiewicz of its gradient map ∇f attains the maximum possible value.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by [9] Now, since it is an easy matter to actually find parametrizations giving equality in the above formula, we conclude by Theorem 7 that Question 2 Is our definition of the local Łojasiewicz exponent equivalent to Lejeune and Teissier's "integral closure definition" used in [3], or to Płoski's "characteristic polynomial definition" (cf. [16]), for every algebraically closed field K?…”
Section: T)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Inspired by [9] Now, since it is an easy matter to actually find parametrizations giving equality in the above formula, we conclude by Theorem 7 that Question 2 Is our definition of the local Łojasiewicz exponent equivalent to Lejeune and Teissier's "integral closure definition" used in [3], or to Płoski's "characteristic polynomial definition" (cf. [16]), for every algebraically closed field K?…”
Section: T)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fact II [4,Proposition 4.1] or [3,Corollary 4.7]. Let f : (C n , 0) → (C, 0) be a SQH function with principal part f 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This inclusion is equivalent to saying that e(I e n−1 (I) ) = e(I e n−1 (I) + m e(I) ), by the Rees' multiplicity theorem. (see [7,27]). …”
Section: And Equality Holds If and Only Ifmentioning
confidence: 98%