Ways of Proof Theory 2010
DOI: 10.1515/9783110324907.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logspace without Bounds

Abstract: This paper provides a recursion-theoretic characterization of the functions computable in logarithmic space, without explicit bounds in the recursion schemes. It can be seen as a variation of the Clote and Takeuti characterization of logspace functions [7], which results from the implementation of an intrinsic growth-control within an inputsorted context.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ramified recurrence has been used to obtain machine-independent characterizations of several major complexity classes, such as polynomial time [4,22] and polynomial space [26,36], as well as alternating log time [8,27], alternating poly-log time [8], NC [23,35], logarithmic space [34], monotonic PTime [13], linear space [21,15,22], NP [2,37], the poly-time hierarchy [3], exponential time [10], Kalmarelementary resources [24], and probabilistic polynomial time [20]. The method is all the more of interest given the roots of ramification in the foundations of mathematics [42,41], thus bridging abstraction levels in set-theory and type-theory to computational complexity classes.…”
Section: The Ramification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ramified recurrence has been used to obtain machine-independent characterizations of several major complexity classes, such as polynomial time [4,22] and polynomial space [26,36], as well as alternating log time [8,27], alternating poly-log time [8], NC [23,35], logarithmic space [34], monotonic PTime [13], linear space [21,15,22], NP [2,37], the poly-time hierarchy [3], exponential time [10], Kalmarelementary resources [24], and probabilistic polynomial time [20]. The method is all the more of interest given the roots of ramification in the foundations of mathematics [42,41], thus bridging abstraction levels in set-theory and type-theory to computational complexity classes.…”
Section: The Ramification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in this paper builds on earlier work on implicit characterisations of logarithmic space complexity classes. While implicit characterisations of complexity classes often focus on minimal formal systems, such as function algebras [36,38,39] or while-languages [26], the results are useful in obtaining a better understanding of the resource usage properties of programming languages. Bonfante [8] shows how to capture logspace by a firstorder functional language.…”
Section: Implicit Characterisations Of Logarithmic Spacementioning
confidence: 99%