2016
DOI: 10.15611/pn.2016.425.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistyka a zarządzanie cyklem kapitału pracującego – rozwiązania stosowane w skali przedsiębiorstwa (Logistics vs. working capital cycle management – solutions used in enterprise scale)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variables taken into account are receivables, liabilities and inventories. This indicator is calculated on the basis of three values as follows (Gelsomino et al, 2017;Bruska & Pisz, 2016): C2C = DSO + DIH -DPO , where:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variables taken into account are receivables, liabilities and inventories. This indicator is calculated on the basis of three values as follows (Gelsomino et al, 2017;Bruska & Pisz, 2016): C2C = DSO + DIH -DPO , where:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bruska and Pisz (2016), for an individual company the interpretation of the indicator is relatively easy -the cash conversion cycle should be as short as possible, which means that the company can quickly recover cash. Shortening the cycle of a single company may, however, have negative effects on the remaining links in the chain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation