2022
DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.2c00315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic Regression-Guided Identification of Cofactor Specificity-Contributing Residues in Enzyme with Sequence Datasets Partitioned by Catalytic Properties

Abstract: Changing the substrate/cofactor specificity of an enzyme requires multiple mutations at spatially adjacent positions around the substrate pocket. However, this is challenging when solely based on crystal structure information because enzymes undergo dynamic conformational changes during the reaction process. Herein, we proposed a method for estimating the contribution of each amino acid residue to substrate specificity by deploying a phylogenetic analysis with logistic regression. Since this method can estimat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically for protein structures featuring a Rossman fold, a deep learning algorithm called Rossman‐toolbox predicts the preference between NADH and NADPH, [212] and Cofactory, also optimized for Rossman folds, predicts a mutant's cofactor specificity and binding affinity for NAD, NADP, FAD, and SAM [212] . A purely sequence‐based ML algorithm for ranking mutations that may cause a switch between NAD and NADP specificity is also available, although the creation of a new optimized model for each protein is required [262] . Another promising, although computationally expensive, approach is to use ML to predict energies, by training them on MD or QM/MM trajectories of a protein of interest.…”
Section: Methods In Computational Enzyme Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically for protein structures featuring a Rossman fold, a deep learning algorithm called Rossman‐toolbox predicts the preference between NADH and NADPH, [212] and Cofactory, also optimized for Rossman folds, predicts a mutant's cofactor specificity and binding affinity for NAD, NADP, FAD, and SAM [212] . A purely sequence‐based ML algorithm for ranking mutations that may cause a switch between NAD and NADP specificity is also available, although the creation of a new optimized model for each protein is required [262] . Another promising, although computationally expensive, approach is to use ML to predict energies, by training them on MD or QM/MM trajectories of a protein of interest.…”
Section: Methods In Computational Enzyme Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[212] A purely sequencebased ML algorithm for ranking mutations that may cause a switch between NAD and NADP specificity is also available, although the creation of a new optimized model for each protein is required. [262] Another promising, although computationally expensive, approach is to use ML to predict energies, by training them on MD or QM/MM trajectories of a protein of interest. At the expense of throughput, such algorithms may lead to more robust predictions than simply using these simulations for rational design.…”
Section: Designing Catalytic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Although this strategy can improve the rate of NAD(P)H regeneration, it is still necessary to add a certain stoichiometric oxidized cofactor exogenously, which increases the process costs and complicates the workup upon reaction completion. Altering cofactor preference by enzyme modification based on structural biotechnology, [17][18][19][20][21] such as turning NADPH-dependent to NADH-dependent, can reduce redox cofactor costs. However, changing the cofactor specificity from the NADPH preference to the NADH preference through protein engineering is difficult to achieve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein engineering is widely employed in both academia and industry to enhance the desired properties of proteins, such as modifying enzyme activities [1], improving antibody binding specificity [2], and increasing stability or yield for productions purposes [3, 4]. In practice, this process typically starts with a natural protein, followed by mutagenesis to generate a set of candidates (mutants), and screening these mutants to identify the ones with desired properties [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%