2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic regression and neural network classification of seismic records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has tweets on Coachella arts and music festival which was held in 2015. The classification results are generated be processed connected elements (Vallejos & Mckinnon, 2013).…”
Section: Azure Sentiment Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has tweets on Coachella arts and music festival which was held in 2015. The classification results are generated be processed connected elements (Vallejos & Mckinnon, 2013).…”
Section: Azure Sentiment Analysis Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the database is modified: the original rock stress factor A or is adjusted using the proportionality factor n, and the modified rock stress factor A 3D is obtained. Finally, the statistical significance of the rock stress factors A or and A 3D on the stability graph boundaries are evaluated and compared, using a contingency matrix and performance metrics analysis [24], [25]. In the following subsections, the extended Mathews database and the contingency matrix and performance metric analysis and presented.…”
Section: Influence Of the Proposed Curves On The Stability Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contingency matrix is a statistical analysis used to test the performance of a classifier [24]. It is based on a comparison of the outcomes predicted by the model with known values.…”
Section: Contingency Matrix and Performance Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having recorded and processed a number of seismic events within a given volume of interest Δ over time Δ , one can then quantify the changes in the strain and stress regimes and in the rheological properties of the rock mass deformation associated with the seismic radiation [1,2]. However, a variety of dynamic processes in mines which radiate seismic waves are detected by the seismic monitoring systems and in general, seismograms generated by a development or production blast and a shear fracturing or a sudden slip on a surface of weakness are the majority of records [3][4][5][6][7][8]. As recorded quarry blasts may mislead scientific interpreting and lead to erroneous results in the analysis of seismic hazards in mines, standard processing of seismic monitoring data require these events to be separated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vallejos and McKinnon proposed the identification of seismic records in seismically active mines by considering the logistic regression and the neural network classification techniques. An efficient methodology was presented for applying these approaches to the classification of seismic records [3]. However, the calculation of seismic source parameters requires precise signal processing, namely expertise-required and time-consuming P-and S-wave hand-picking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%