2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-69206-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logistic Real Estate Investment and REITs in Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From an academic perspective, the paper offers interesting insights into the logistics real estate industry, with its analysis of the extant literature and extending the research in this field. In this sense, the results add to previous literature on the topic (Ma et al, 2018;Oh andShin, 2016, Buttimer et al, 1997), clarifying the concepts of quality (Case and Quigley, 1991) and functionality (Mattarocci and Pekdemir, 2017) in logistics real estate, as well as assessing the two aspects through a structured quantitative tool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From an academic perspective, the paper offers interesting insights into the logistics real estate industry, with its analysis of the extant literature and extending the research in this field. In this sense, the results add to previous literature on the topic (Ma et al, 2018;Oh andShin, 2016, Buttimer et al, 1997), clarifying the concepts of quality (Case and Quigley, 1991) and functionality (Mattarocci and Pekdemir, 2017) in logistics real estate, as well as assessing the two aspects through a structured quantitative tool.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The proposed model, on the contrary, offers a comprehensive assessment of a number of relevant features, obtained from both literature and practitioners, and these are evaluated simultaneously. The assessment also takes into account the prevailing building functionality (warehouse versus cross-docking facility), as recommended by Mattarocci and Pekdemir (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations