2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12736-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logic Programming and Logarithmic Space

Abstract: Abstract. We present an algebraic view on logic programming, related to proof theory and more specifically linear logic and geometry of interaction. Within this construction, a characterization of logspace (deterministic and non-deterministic) computation is given via a synctactic restriction, using an encoding of words that derives from proof theory. We show that the acceptance of a word by an observation (the counterpart of a program in the encoding) can be decided within logarithmic space, by reducing this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding a "stack plugin" to observations extends modularly previous works [2,3,5,6] and gives the perfect tool to characterize Ptime. This modularity was inspired by the classical addition of a stack to an automaton, allowing to switch from Logspace to Ptime, and providing a decisive proof technique: memoizationor exponentiation by squaring in our context-implemented as saturation.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Adding a "stack plugin" to observations extends modularly previous works [2,3,5,6] and gives the perfect tool to characterize Ptime. This modularity was inspired by the classical addition of a stack to an automaton, allowing to switch from Logspace to Ptime, and providing a decisive proof technique: memoizationor exponentiation by squaring in our context-implemented as saturation.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Definition 11 (observation semiring). We define the semirings P ⊥ of flows that do not use the symbols in P; and Σ lr the semiring generated by flows of the form c This simple restriction was shown to characterize (non-deterministic) logarithmic space computation [3,, with a natural subclass of balanced wirings corresponding to the deterministic case. The balanced restriction won't be further considered, even if previous results on the nilpotency problem for balanced wirings [3, p. 54], [8, Theorem IV.12] are required to complete the detailed proof of Theorem 5 [4,8].…”
Section: We Carry On the Convention Of Writingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations