2010
DOI: 10.1142/9789814322898_0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logarithmic Decay of Hyperbolic Equations with Arbitrary Small Boundary Damping

Abstract: In this paper, we study the logarithmic stability for the hyperbolic equations by arbitrary boundary observation. Based on Carleman estimate, we first prove an estimate of the resolvent operator of such equation. Then we prove the logarithmic stability estimate for the hyperbolic equations without any assumption on an observation subboundary.2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 93B05; Secondary 93B07, 35B37.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal result without any geometrical hypothesis is given in . We also recall the result by Fu , where the author proved a result similar to the one in for less regular conditions (ΩC2) by adopting the global Carleman estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The optimal result without any geometrical hypothesis is given in . We also recall the result by Fu , where the author proved a result similar to the one in for less regular conditions (ΩC2) by adopting the global Carleman estimate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Observe that the semi-group property does not imply anymore that the rate of convergence in (1.2) is exponential, and there are many practical examples where the decay is only logarithmic or polynomial (see e.g. [15,16,17,28,6,19,26,32,9,12]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very interesting logarithmic decay results were given in [2,18] for the hyperbolic system with boundary damping under the regularity assumption that a jk (·), a(·), and ∂Ω are C ∞ -smooth. Recently, in [11], the author generalize the results of Lebeau-Robbiano [18] to the case of C 2 coefficients and a domain with C 2 boundary. However, to the best of the author's knowledge, there is no result about system (1.4) under sharp regularity assumption on the coefficients a jk (·) ∈ C 1 (Ω; R).…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Here, our global Carleman estimate only needs C 1 -regularity for the coefficient a jk (·) instead of C 2 -regularity appeared in [11], which is the main novelty of this paper. Our approach, stimulated by [17] (see also [9,12,28]), is different from that in [18], which instead employed the classical local Carleman estimate and therefore needs the C ∞ -regularity of the related coefficients.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation