2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logarithmic corrections to higher twist scaling at strong coupling from AdS/CFT

Abstract: We compute 1-loop correction E 1 to the energy of folded string in AdS 5 × S 5 (carrying spin S in AdS 5 and momentum J in S 5 ) using a "long string" approximation in which S ≫ J ≫ 1. According to the AdS/CFT the function E 1 should represent first subleading correction to strong coupling expansion of anomalous dimension of higher twist SL(2) sector operators of the form TrD S Z J . We show that E 1 smoothly interpolates between the ln S regime (previously found in the J → 0 case) and the λ/J 2 ln 3 (S/J) reg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

32
396
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(429 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(181 reference statements)
32
396
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A very interesting question is how f (g, j) behaves at strong coupling. Indeed we would like to make contact with the already known results from string theory [15,16,3,20,21,23]. A potential trouble is that in the semi-classical computations pioneered by Frolov and Tseytlin [15] the coupling constant g is intricately entangled with the, respectively, AdS 5 and S 5 charges M and L. In [3] the strong coupling limit of the dimension ∆ of the operators (1.1) was predicted from the results of [15,16] on the energy of a folded string soliton (see also the discussion in [20,21,23,24]).…”
Section: Introduction Main Result and Open Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very interesting question is how f (g, j) behaves at strong coupling. Indeed we would like to make contact with the already known results from string theory [15,16,3,20,21,23]. A potential trouble is that in the semi-classical computations pioneered by Frolov and Tseytlin [15] the coupling constant g is intricately entangled with the, respectively, AdS 5 and S 5 charges M and L. In [3] the strong coupling limit of the dimension ∆ of the operators (1.1) was predicted from the results of [15,16] on the energy of a folded string soliton (see also the discussion in [20,21,23,24]).…”
Section: Introduction Main Result and Open Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…one finds that the semi-classical [18] as well as the one loop energy [19] can be written down in a closed form as a function of z. Furthermore, the formula obtained for the string energy interpolates smoothly between small and large values of z and the large-z expansion looks as (3) just with the replacement log S → log( S J ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We start in section 2 by recalling from reference [19] the description of the folded string rotating on AdS 3 × S 1 ⊂ AdS 5 × S 5 in the limit given by eqn. (4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytic form of the quantum correction can be found in the limit of large S when the ends of the string reach the boundary of the AdS 5 . Then the solution drastically simplifies (ρ becomes linear in σ) [3,4] and one finds that E 1 = c 1 ln S + ..., c 1 = − 3 ln 2 π . Since rotation of the string balances the contracting effect of its tension, smaller values of the spin correspond to smaller values of the length of the string whose center of mass is at ρ = 0: S essentially measures the length of the string.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the order of limits was different (we first expanded in ǫ for fixed ν) and that could be a possible reason for a disagreement between (B.24) and (B.25). 4 To recover the standard fast string result one would need to start with the short string fluctuation operators in (B.13), where no assumption on S ν was made, use them and (B.17) without expanding in ǫ, compute the determinants needed in (B.11), then expand in large ν with S ν kept fixed, and at the end take S ν to be small. One can then consider the 1-loop correction in the small ν region by taking ǫ to zero while keeping the parameter x ≡ ν ǫ fixed, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%