2009
DOI: 10.3934/jmd.2009.3.359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Logarithm laws for unipotent flows, I

Abstract: We prove analogs of the logarithm laws of Sullivan and Kleinbock-Margulis in the context of unipotent flows. In particular, we obtain results for one-parameter actions on the space of lattices SL(n,R)/ SL(n,Z). The key lemma for our results says the measure of the set of unimodular lattices in R n that does not intersect a 'large' volume subset of R n is 'small'. This can be considered as a 'random' analog of the classical Minkowski Theorem in the geometry of numbers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
105
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For non‐diagonalizable actions, less is known. Here Athreya and Margulis considered the cases where H is the expanding horospherical group corresponding to a diagonalizable flow as well as the case where H is a 1‐dimensional unipotent group acting on the space of lattices SL nfalse(double-struckZfalse) SL nfalse(double-struckRfalse) , and in both cases they managed to prove logarithm laws. Similar results were also obtained by Kelmer and Mohammadi for cusp excursions of one parameter unipotent flows on spaces of the form ΓG, where G is a product of a number of copies of SL 2false(double-struckRfalse) and SL 2false(double-struckCfalse) and normalΓ is irreducible, and more recently in a forthcoming paper by Yu when G= SO (n,1).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For non‐diagonalizable actions, less is known. Here Athreya and Margulis considered the cases where H is the expanding horospherical group corresponding to a diagonalizable flow as well as the case where H is a 1‐dimensional unipotent group acting on the space of lattices SL nfalse(double-struckZfalse) SL nfalse(double-struckRfalse) , and in both cases they managed to prove logarithm laws. Similar results were also obtained by Kelmer and Mohammadi for cusp excursions of one parameter unipotent flows on spaces of the form ΓG, where G is a product of a number of copies of SL 2false(double-struckRfalse) and SL 2false(double-struckCfalse) and normalΓ is irreducible, and more recently in a forthcoming paper by Yu when G= SO (n,1).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let B denote the closed Euclidean ball in R n that is centered at the origin and whose measure is equal to m(E). By Lemma 4.2 in [AM09] and the proof of Theorem 2.2 in [AM09] (see Section 4.1 of [AM09]), it follows…”
Section: Generalities Concerning the Acting Group And Counting Result...mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here, the authors explicitly use a shrinking target argument. In 2009, Athreya and Margulis [2] [3] extended Sullivan's result to unipotent flows on the space of lattices also using a shrinking target argument. For the interested reader, many of these results are put into a more general framework in a survey by Athreya [1].…”
Section: Brief History Of Shrinking Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition 1.1 (Square-tiled Surface [15] [24]). A square-tiled surface is a pair (X, ω), where X is a closed Riemann surface and ω a holomorphic 1-form, given by a (finite) branched cover over the square torus, π : X → T 2 , branched over 0. The one-form ω is given by the pullback of dz under the covering map π, ω = π * (dz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%