Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '05 2005
DOI: 10.3115/1219840.1219897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Log-linear models for word alignment

Abstract: We present a framework for word alignment based on log-linear models. All knowledge sources are treated as feature functions, which depend on the source langauge sentence, the target language sentence and possible additional variables. Log-linear models allow statistical alignment models to be easily extended by incorporating syntactic information. In this paper, we use IBM Model 3 alignment probabilities, POS correspondence, and bilingual dictionary coverage as features. Our experiments show that log-linear m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, various discriminative models have been proposed in the literature (Liu et al, 2005;Moore, 2005;Taskar et al, 2005). Their advantage is that they may integrate a wide range of features that may lead to improved alignment quality.…”
Section: Word Alignment and Smtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, various discriminative models have been proposed in the literature (Liu et al, 2005;Moore, 2005;Taskar et al, 2005). Their advantage is that they may integrate a wide range of features that may lead to improved alignment quality.…”
Section: Word Alignment and Smtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general there are exponentially many such sequences, each implying a different alignment of y to x. This model is reminiscent of conditional models in MT that perform stepwise generation of one string or structure from another-e.g., string alignment models with contextual features (Cherry and Lin, 2003;Liu et al, 2005;Dyer et al, 2013), or tree transducers (Knight and Graehl, 2005).…”
Section: Stochastic Contextual Edit Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We prefer log-linear models over reasonable alternatives e.g., perceptron or SVM, following the practice of a range of previous work in related areas (Smith, 2004;Liu et al, 2005;Poon et al, 2009;Bamman et al, 2012a;Filippova, 2012;Volkova and Bachrach, 2015;Hovy, 2015).…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%