2010
DOI: 10.1002/humu.21332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locus-specific database domain and data content analysis: evolution and content maturation toward clinical usea

Abstract: Genetic variation databases have become indispensable in many areas of health care. In addition, more and more experts are depositing published and unpublished disease-causing variants of particular genes into locus-specific databases (LSDBs). Some of these databases contain such extensive information that they have become known as knowledge bases. Here, we analyzed 1,188 LSDBs and their content for the presence or absence of 44 content criteria related to database features (general presentation, locus-specifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we searched the GEN2PHEN Knowledge Center LSDB listing [Webb et al, 2011; http://www.gen2phen.org/data/lsdbs] to identify mutation databases for the genes selected in the previous stage and compared the database system used, curator status, number and update of variants reported. The results were compared with the situation of neurogenetic databases in 2010 [Mitropoulou et al, 2010]. A total of 1,025 genes were identified, for 98 of which no database was listed.…”
Section: Current Landscape Of Lsdbs For Neurological Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we searched the GEN2PHEN Knowledge Center LSDB listing [Webb et al, 2011; http://www.gen2phen.org/data/lsdbs] to identify mutation databases for the genes selected in the previous stage and compared the database system used, curator status, number and update of variants reported. The results were compared with the situation of neurogenetic databases in 2010 [Mitropoulou et al, 2010]. A total of 1,025 genes were identified, for 98 of which no database was listed.…”
Section: Current Landscape Of Lsdbs For Neurological Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of this needs to be conducted within an overarching framework of ethical practice, policy guidelines, and data governance. However, if these challenges can be addressed, this would enable an integrated view of genotypic and/or phenotypic knowledgebases, across multiple institutions worldwide [Mitropoulou et al, 2010;Olivier et al, 2009;Thorisson et al, 2009].…”
Section: Knowledgebases and Educational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already close to 2,000 LSDBs [Mitropoulou et al, 2010], with more than one database for some genes and diseases. More recently, a database has been created for every gene associated with a Mendelian disorder by the authors of the LOVD LSDB system [Fokkema et al, 2011] with support from the GEN2PHEN project (http://www.gen2phen.org/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%