2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.joep.2019.102205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locus of control and marital satisfaction: Couple perspectives using Australian data

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are different ways to construct locus of control variables. A common approach in the literature consists in adding scores from questions eliciting locus of control (Cobb-Clark and Schurer, 2013;Kesavayuth et al, 2020;Lee and McKinnish, 2019;Wijbenga and van Witteloostuijn, 2007), their standardized values (Coleman and DeLeire, 2003) or computing their average (Schnitzlein and Stephani, 2016). Some studies use this aggregate measure and identify respondents with internal rather than external locus of control depending on their relative position in the distribution, e.g.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are different ways to construct locus of control variables. A common approach in the literature consists in adding scores from questions eliciting locus of control (Cobb-Clark and Schurer, 2013;Kesavayuth et al, 2020;Lee and McKinnish, 2019;Wijbenga and van Witteloostuijn, 2007), their standardized values (Coleman and DeLeire, 2003) or computing their average (Schnitzlein and Stephani, 2016). Some studies use this aggregate measure and identify respondents with internal rather than external locus of control depending on their relative position in the distribution, e.g.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paper contributes to the literature studying the relevance of locus of control on several dimensions of individual behavior. Previous research finds that internal locus of control is related to higher marital satisfaction (Lee and McKinnish, 2019), which may have implications on marital duration, individual and family economic decisions. A key dimension for locus of control is human capital investment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The traits of wanting to be valued and perceived to be valued by others have both been independently associated with maintenance mechanisms such as positive sentiment toward partners, self‐reported maintenance behaviors, perceptions of partners' maintenance behaviors (e.g., enacting sacrifice, affection, warmth, and support), and observations of responsive and unresponsive behaviors (Lemay & Spongberg, 2015). An internal locus of control has been found to relate to perceptions of partner willingness to engage in relationship maintenance strategies in response to relational problems (Lee & McKinnish, 2019). Tendencies toward self‐compassion and conscientious (Baker & McNulty, 2011), as well as relational orientations such as communal versus exchange (Stafford, 2020b), have also been explored.…”
Section: Reflecting On the Past: What Maintenance Research Has Beenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the HILDA Survey, locus of control is measured using the Perarlin Mastery Scale (Pearlin and Schooler 1978). It has been shown using this measure that having an internal locus of control-meaning that the person believes they are in control-is positively associated with savings (Cobb-Clark, Kassenboehmer and Sinning 2016), healthy lifestyle habits (Cobb-Clark, Kassenboehmer and Schurer 2016) and higher marital satisfaction (Lee and McKinnish 2019).…”
Section: O'mentioning
confidence: 99%