2021
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locus coeruleus integrity and the effect of atomoxetine on response inhibition in Parkinson’s disease

Abstract: Cognitive decline is a common feature of Parkinson’s disease, and many of these cognitive deficits fail to respond to dopaminergic therapy. Therefore, targeting other neuromodulatory systems represents an important therapeutic strategy. Among these, the locus coeruleus-noradrenaline system has been extensively implicated in response inhibition deficits. Restoring noradrenaline levels using the noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine can improve response inhibition in some patients with Parkinson’s disease… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
83
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(155 reference statements)
2
83
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Atomoxetine can have mild sedative effects, increasing omission errors and decreasing response accuracy specifically in the context of rapid stimulus presentation (Toschi et al, 2021). However, atomoxetine did not affect basic task performance in the current study or in a stopsignal task, either at the group-average level or in relation to individual differences in locus coeruleus CNR (O'Callaghan et al, 2021). This argues against a simple effect via arousal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…Atomoxetine can have mild sedative effects, increasing omission errors and decreasing response accuracy specifically in the context of rapid stimulus presentation (Toschi et al, 2021). However, atomoxetine did not affect basic task performance in the current study or in a stopsignal task, either at the group-average level or in relation to individual differences in locus coeruleus CNR (O'Callaghan et al, 2021). This argues against a simple effect via arousal.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…These attentional failures can be common in the stop-signal task and, if not accounted for, bias estimation of the stop process (Band et al, 2003;Matzke et al, 2019;Skippen et al, 2019). Prior to fitting the model, we excluded implausibly fast (< 0.25s) RTs, as well as outliers go RTs exceeding ±2.5 standard deviations from the participant's mean (Matzke, Dolan, Logan, Brown, & Wagenmakers, 2013;O'Callaghan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted prior distributions identical to those suggested by the model developers (Heathcote et al, 2018), except for slightly higher prior mean values for μgo-match (1.5s), μgo-mismatch (1.5s) and μstop (1s), to account for slower RT in older age (O'Callaghan et al, 2021). MCMC sampling initially ran with 33 chains (i.e., three times the number of parameters), with thinning of every 10th sample and a 5% probability of migration.…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations