Abstract:Locoregional treatment while on the waiting list for liver transplantation (Ltx) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been shown to improve survival. However, the effect of treatment type has not been investigated. We investigate the effect of locoregional treatment type on survival after Ltx for HCC. We investigated patients registered in the European Liver Transplant Registry database using multivariate Cox regression survival analysis. Information on locoregional therapy was registered for 4978 of 23 124 … Show more
“…Even though NASH related cirrhosis is still less frequent in Europe compared with the US, it is anticipated to become the leading indication for LT within the next decade. In terms of results, all the indications have shown an improvement of survival especially HCC, mainly because of a better selection of patients, and the increasing effectiveness of down-staging techniques [18]. The ELTR cohort of patients has also established that some rare malignant tumors like hepatic hemangiosarcoma should be considered absolute contraindications for LT [19], while others like hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia [8] or hepatic epithelioid hemangio-endothelioma represent a good indication even in the presence of limited extrahepatic disease [12,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample of these studies is cited in the references of the manuscript. With reports concerning LT for specific hepatic diseases [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], analysis of the impact of the type of preservation solution [25], and of the immunosuppressive regimen on the patient outcome [26], ELTR has helped develop risk models for mortality following liver-transplantation [27,28]. Owing to the large cohort of patients, the exhaustiveness, and quality of the data, and the long follow-up provided by the ELTR, the results are really representative of LT in Europe.…”
Summary
The purpose of this registry study was to provide an overview of trends and results of liver transplantation (LT) in Europe from 1968 to 2016. These data on LT were collected prospectively from 169 centers from 32 countries, in the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) beginning in 1968. This overview provides epidemiological data, as well as information on evolution of techniques, and outcomes in LT in Europe over more than five decades; something that cannot be obtained from only a single center experience.
“…Even though NASH related cirrhosis is still less frequent in Europe compared with the US, it is anticipated to become the leading indication for LT within the next decade. In terms of results, all the indications have shown an improvement of survival especially HCC, mainly because of a better selection of patients, and the increasing effectiveness of down-staging techniques [18]. The ELTR cohort of patients has also established that some rare malignant tumors like hepatic hemangiosarcoma should be considered absolute contraindications for LT [19], while others like hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia [8] or hepatic epithelioid hemangio-endothelioma represent a good indication even in the presence of limited extrahepatic disease [12,24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample of these studies is cited in the references of the manuscript. With reports concerning LT for specific hepatic diseases [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], analysis of the impact of the type of preservation solution [25], and of the immunosuppressive regimen on the patient outcome [26], ELTR has helped develop risk models for mortality following liver-transplantation [27,28]. Owing to the large cohort of patients, the exhaustiveness, and quality of the data, and the long follow-up provided by the ELTR, the results are really representative of LT in Europe.…”
Summary
The purpose of this registry study was to provide an overview of trends and results of liver transplantation (LT) in Europe from 1968 to 2016. These data on LT were collected prospectively from 169 centers from 32 countries, in the European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR) beginning in 1968. This overview provides epidemiological data, as well as information on evolution of techniques, and outcomes in LT in Europe over more than five decades; something that cannot be obtained from only a single center experience.
“…Neoadjuvant locoregional therapy (LRT) is an established treatment option in HCC patients considered for LT to both decrease the waiting list dropout rate and downstage tumors to meet transplant eligibility . Presence of partial necrosis after LRT has been identified as a major risk factor for tumor recurrence after LT …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Neoadjuvant locoregional therapy (LRT) is an established treatment option in HCC patients considered for LT to both decrease the waiting list dropout rate (2,3) and downstage tumors to meet transplant eligibility. (3)(4)(5)(6) Presence of partial necrosis after LRT has been identified as a major risk factor for tumor recurrence after LT. (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) A large, monocenter study (13) reported a very low HCC recurrence rate (<3% within 5 years) in patients with complete histological response after LRT compared to 10%-15% of tumor recurrence observed in patients meeting Milan criteria at explant pathology. These results were confirmed by a recent multicenter study, where only 5% of patients with no evidence of residual vital tumor (RVT) in explant histopathological exams showed a 5-year HCC recurrence compared to 40% of recurrences observed in patients having an RVT ≥2 cm.…”
This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of three‐dimensional (3D)‐navigated multiprobe radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with intraprocedural image fusion for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by histopathological examination. From 2009 to 2018, 97 patients (84 men, 13 women; median age, 60 years; range, 1‐71) were transplanted after bridging therapy of 195 HCCs by stereotactic RFA (SRFA). The median interval between the first SRFA and transplantation was 6.8 months (range, 0‐71). The rate of residual vital tissue (RVT) could be assessed in 188 of 195 lesions in 96 of 97 patients by histological examination of the explanted livers using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Tdt‐mediated UTP nick‐end labeling (TUNEL) stains. Histopathological results were compared with the findings of the last computed tomography (CT) imaging before liver transplantation (LT). Median number and size of treated tumors were 1 (range, 1‐8) and 2.5 cm (range, 1‐8). Complete radiological response was achieved in 186 of 188 nodules (98.9%) and 94 of 96 patients (97.9%) and complete pathological response in the explanted liver specimen in 183 of 188 nodules (97.3%) and 91 of 96 patients (94.8%), respectively. In lesions ≥3 cm, complete tumor cell death was achieved in 50 of 52 nodules (96.2%). Residual tumor did not correlate with tumor size (P = 0.5). Conclusion: Multiprobe SRFA with intraprocedural image fusion represents an efficient, minimally invasive therapy for HCC, even with tumor sizes larger than 3 cm, and without the need of a combination with additional treatments. The results seem to justify the additional efforts related to the stereotactic approach.
“…Case series and cohort studies have demonstrated that RFA may reduce the dropout rate of HCC patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation to 0–25% [76]. …”
Background: Patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ≤3 cm and preserved liver function have the highest likelihood to be cured if treated. The most adequate treatment methods are yet a matter that is debated. Methods: We reviewed the literature about open anatomic resection (AR), laparoscopic liver resection (LLR), and percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA). Results: PTA is effective as resection for HCC < 2 cm, when they are neither subcapsular nor perivascular. PTA in HCC of 2–3 cm is under evaluation. AR with the removal of the tumor-bearing portal territory is recommended for HCC > 2 cm, except for subcapsular ones. In comparison with open surgery, LRR has better short-term outcomes and non-inferior long-term outcomes. LLR is standardized for superficial limited resections and for left-sided AR. Conclusions: According to the available evidences, the following therapeutic proposal can be advanced. Laparoscopic limited resection is the standard for any subcapsular HCC. PTA is the first-line treatment for deep-located HCC < 2 cm, except for those in contact with Glissonean pedicles. Laparoscopic AR is the standard for deep-located HCC of 2–3 cm of the left liver, while open AR is the standard for deep-located HCC of 2–3 cm in the right liver. HCC in contact with Glissonean pedicles should be scheduled for resection (open or laparoscopic) independent of their size. Liver transplantation is reserved to otherwise untreatable patients or as a salvage procedure at recurrence.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.