2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-006-0261-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locomotor kinematics and behaviour in the escape response of European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax L., exposed to hypoxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
53
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
11
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Changes in DO showed no significant effect on U fast, which was consistent with previous studies on European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax and golden grey mullet Liza aurata (Lefrançois et al 2005, Lefrançois & Domenici 2006. The absence of a DO effect on U fast is easily understood because the faststart movement occurs within seconds and is mainly limited by ATP and PCr in muscle tissues, and thus may be largely independent of DO levels.…”
Section: Effect Of Do On Swimming Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Changes in DO showed no significant effect on U fast, which was consistent with previous studies on European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax and golden grey mullet Liza aurata (Lefrançois et al 2005, Lefrançois & Domenici 2006. The absence of a DO effect on U fast is easily understood because the faststart movement occurs within seconds and is mainly limited by ATP and PCr in muscle tissues, and thus may be largely independent of DO levels.…”
Section: Effect Of Do On Swimming Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…U crit ) than the other 2 swimming performances. A depressed U crit under lower temperatures and DO concentrations has been widely documented (Pang et al 2011, Zhao et al 2012; however, little work has been performed on U fast and U cat (Lefrançois et al 2005, Lefrançois & Domenici 2006, Wang et al 2012. Furthermore, no study has investigated the effects of different environmental changes on the different swimming capacities within a single fish species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The U CAT in the present study was approximately 60% higher than U crit measured in similar-sized sea bass at similar temperatures (Claireaux et al, 2006). The observed U CAT (~150cms -1 ) is still appreciably lower than the velocity of 200cms -1 achieved during a single startle response (Lefrançois and Domenici, 2006) or of 205cms -1 in an aquatic 'drag strip' (Claireaux et al, 2007). Performance in the CAT was independent of size across a fairly broad range, mirroring the previously determined size independence of sprint performance (Nelson and Claireaux, 2005;Claireaux et al, 2007).…”
Section: Constant Acceleration Performancecontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The actual reaction time of blind cave fish is likely to be greater than this assumed reaction time as the startle response measured by Weiss and colleagues (Weiss et al, 2006) is mediated by the Mauthner cells, which are adapted for extremely fast reactions and represent an extreme for the minimum possible reaction time. However, the reaction times of fish for responses not mediated by the Mauthner cells are of the same order (Eaton et al, 1984;Lefrancois and Domenici, 2006) and would lead to an extension of the detection distance of the order of a few millimetres. For example, a reaction time of 40 ms would lead to a detection distance of 6.5 mm.…”
Section: Discussion Effective Range and Velocity Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%