1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)88001-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
108
0
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
108
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we stimulated patients with spinal lesions, these effects might be better explained by spinal fiber systems than by influences on motor cortical systems. Examples for a crossing fiber system are the central pattern generator [16][17][18][19] or the fibers of the flexor reflex afferents. 18,20 Enhanced reactivity is often seen in patients with spinal cord lesions and spasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since we stimulated patients with spinal lesions, these effects might be better explained by spinal fiber systems than by influences on motor cortical systems. Examples for a crossing fiber system are the central pattern generator [16][17][18][19] or the fibers of the flexor reflex afferents. 18,20 Enhanced reactivity is often seen in patients with spinal cord lesions and spasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can be considered an attempt to regenerate spinal motor systems, suggesting the large potential for neuroplastic changes within injured spinal motor systems. 23 These motor systems are influenced for short periods, that is, during physiotherapy 3 or with treadmill training 16 that leads to reduced spastic tone or automatic step cycling. We hypothesize that the repetitive magnetic stimulation can influence these injured spinal motor systems by reducing spastic tone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondarily occurring non-neuronal changes, that is, alteration in muscle mechanic, rather than a neuronal hyperactivity, are assumed to be responsible to increased muscle tone at the subacute stage after the SCI. [30][31][32] In addition, the difference in the level of muscle activity between active (movement) and passive (clinical) conditions is lesser in spastic limbs than in unaffected limbs. 33 Both spinal and supraspinal lesions lead to both loss of supraspinal drive and defective use of afferent input.…”
Section: Neuronal Dysfunction After Scimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years it has been shown that speci®c locomotor training could enhance locomotor activity and thereby improve mobility. 44,45 Antispastic drug therapy is the second tool. It reduces muscle tone and spasms by the induction of a paresis which may interfere with the performance of functional movements.…”
Section: Therapeutic Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%