1951
DOI: 10.2307/1375371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locomotion in Kangaroo Rats and Its Adaptive Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
108
0
4

Year Published

1961
1961
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
108
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…(Effectively, the tail could contact and penetrate the ground with no effect on the animat.) We expected solutions to instead use the tail as a counterbalance to angular momentum, consistent with a prevailing hypothesis in biology (Bartholomew and Caswell, 1951;Alexander and Vernon, 1975;Libby et al, 2012). Instead, the results from all replicate runs tended towards bounding gaits similar to those in Treatment 1.…”
Section: Ecal -General Tracksupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Effectively, the tail could contact and penetrate the ground with no effect on the animat.) We expected solutions to instead use the tail as a counterbalance to angular momentum, consistent with a prevailing hypothesis in biology (Bartholomew and Caswell, 1951;Alexander and Vernon, 1975;Libby et al, 2012). Instead, the results from all replicate runs tended towards bounding gaits similar to those in Treatment 1.…”
Section: Ecal -General Tracksupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In biology, it is generally agreed that an important function of the tail is to counter the angular momentum of the body, discouraging body pitch changes over the hopping period (Bartholomew and Caswell, 1951;Libby et al, 2012). Since we had based the animat's morphology on the kangaroo rat, we were curious what solutions would be discovered if tail length and tail mass were allowed to evolve.…”
Section: Ecal -General Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the San Joaquin Valley is desert (Germano et al 2011),with non-native grasses invading the area about 2 centuries ago. Dense grass and forb cover may hinder the movements of kangaroo rats (Bartholomew & Caswell 1951, O'Farrell & Uptain 1987 and can lead to their extirpation at a site ). Also, it is possible that dense herbaceous cover interferes with foraging (Brock & Kelt 2004), because heteromyid rodents primarily harvest seeds off of the soil surface (Price & Joyner 1997) by scratch digging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They travel at average speeds from 3 to over 6 kph (Reichman and Kaufrnan, 1983). They can hop at 32 kph when fleeing a predator, traveling in an erratic path (Bartholomew and Caswell, 1951) and can jump to heights over 1 m. Perognathus are quadrupedal and travel more slowly (1.76 kph for P. longimembris).…”
Section: Foraging and Predator Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Olfaction is used predominantly in identifying food, followed by tactile cues, with little reliance on vision (Reichman and Oberstein, 1977;Lawhon and Hafner, 1981;Eisenberg, 1963a;Bartholomew and Caswell, 1951). Kangaroo rats in the laboratory can detect food in loose soil to depths of almost 8 cm (Reichman and Oberstein, 1977).…”
Section: Foraging and Predator Avoidancementioning
confidence: 99%