Abstract:This meta-analysis quantitatively summarized the developmental influence and the effects of locomotor experience as well as the benefits of locomotor practice, locomotor assistance, and active searching patterns on children's search performance. Based on specific criteria, a search of a database and reference lists identified 19 studies, including 1,029 children (510 boys and 519 girls) from 4 to 144 months of age. Outcome measures of spatial performance were converted to 83 effect sizes that reflected the eff… Show more
“…First, assuming that infants of the same chronological (and gestational) age are at the same level of maturity, the differences observed in the present experiment cannot be attributed to maturation alone because the age of the infants was the same irrespective of their crawling status. Second, although the beneficial effects of active exploration within the context of an experiment have been well established (Bensen & Uzgiris, 1985;Feldman & Acredolo, 1979; for review, see Yan, Thomas & Downing, 1998), this kind of proximal mechanism cannot explain the effect of crawling reported here. In the present experiment, and in others, infants were not allowed to engage in exploratory behavior during the task per se ; rather, independent locomotion outside the experimental context enhanced performance on the target task.…”
In the present experiment, we used a deferred imitation paradigm to explore the effect of crawling on memory retrieval by 9-month-old human infants. Infants observed an experimenter demonstrate a single target action with a novel object and their ability to reproduce that action was assessed after a 24-hr delay. Some infants were tested with the demonstration stimulus in the demonstration context and some infants were tested with a different stimulus in a different context. Half of the infants in each test condition were crawling at the time of participation and half were not. Both crawling and non-crawling infants exhibited retention when tested with the demonstration stimulus in the demonstration context, but only infants who were crawling by 9 months of age exhibited retention when tested with a different stimulus in a different context. These findings demonstrate that the onset of independent locomotion is associated with more flexible memory retrieval during the first year of life.
“…First, assuming that infants of the same chronological (and gestational) age are at the same level of maturity, the differences observed in the present experiment cannot be attributed to maturation alone because the age of the infants was the same irrespective of their crawling status. Second, although the beneficial effects of active exploration within the context of an experiment have been well established (Bensen & Uzgiris, 1985;Feldman & Acredolo, 1979; for review, see Yan, Thomas & Downing, 1998), this kind of proximal mechanism cannot explain the effect of crawling reported here. In the present experiment, and in others, infants were not allowed to engage in exploratory behavior during the task per se ; rather, independent locomotion outside the experimental context enhanced performance on the target task.…”
In the present experiment, we used a deferred imitation paradigm to explore the effect of crawling on memory retrieval by 9-month-old human infants. Infants observed an experimenter demonstrate a single target action with a novel object and their ability to reproduce that action was assessed after a 24-hr delay. Some infants were tested with the demonstration stimulus in the demonstration context and some infants were tested with a different stimulus in a different context. Half of the infants in each test condition were crawling at the time of participation and half were not. Both crawling and non-crawling infants exhibited retention when tested with the demonstration stimulus in the demonstration context, but only infants who were crawling by 9 months of age exhibited retention when tested with a different stimulus in a different context. These findings demonstrate that the onset of independent locomotion is associated with more flexible memory retrieval during the first year of life.
“…This finding is important because it further highlights the distinction between the experiences that are associated with locomotion and the means by which locomotion is achieved. A considerable body of research with typically developing children now shows that active locomotion facilitates spatial search performance (Yan et al, 1998). …”
Section: What Implications Do Motor Disabilities Have For Psychologicmentioning
The psychological revolution that follows the onset of independent locomotion in the latter half of the infant's first year provides one of the best illustrations of the intimate connection between action and psychological processes. In this paper, we document some of the dramatic changes in perception-action coupling, spatial cognition, memory, and social and emotional development that follow the acquisition of independent locomotion. We highlight the range of converging research operations that have been used to examine the relation between locomotor experience and psychological development, and we describe recent attempts to uncover the processes that underlie this relation. Finally, we address three important questions about the relation that have received scant attention in the research literature. These questions include: (1) What changes in the brain occur when infants acquire experience with locomotion? (2) What role does locomotion play in the maintenance of psychological function? (3) What implications do motor disabilities have for psychological development? Seeking the answers to these questions can provide rich insights into the relation between action and psychological processes and the general processes that underlie human development.
“…A global‐to‐global relation between cognitive and motor behavior was assumed by Bushnell and Boudreau (1993), who stated that motor development might determine the sequence in which certain perceptual and cognitive abilities unfold. This notion is experimentally supported by the finding that the development of spatial search skills in children is facilitated by locomotion experience; however, this facilitation does not appear to provide any long‐lasting benefits to children who achieve locomotor milestones early (Kermoian & Campos, 1988; Lehnung et al, 2003; Yan, Thomas, & Downing, 1998).…”
The relation between cognitive and motor performance was studied in a sample of 378 children aged 5-6. Half of these children had no behavior problems; the others were selected for externalizing (38%) or internalizing problems (12%). Quantitative and qualitative aspects of motor performance were related to several aspects of cognition, after controlling for the influence of attention. No relation between global aspects of cognitive and motor performance was found. Specific positive relations were found between both aspects of motor performance, visual motor integration and working memory, and between quantitative aspects of motor performance and fluency. These findings reveal interesting parallels between normal cognitive and motor development in 5- to 6-year-old children that cannot be ascribed to attention processes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.