2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.857444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lockdown Policies, Economic Support, and Mental Health: Evidence From the COVID-19 Pandemic in United States

Abstract: During the COVID-19 pandemic, various lockdown policies were put in place by the governments in different countries and different levels, which effectively curbed the spread of the virus, but also cause substantial damage to the mental health of local residents. We use statistics provided by the Household Pulse Survey and OxCGRT between 23 April 2020 and 30 August 2021 to analyze the impact of lockdown on overall mental health levels in US states during the COVID-19 pandemic at the macro level. The results sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…OxCGRT has appeared in multiple studies (eMethods and eTable 1 in Supplement 1). To distinguish policy purposes, we recategorized OxCGRT components into 2 new indexes: the Stringency and Restrictive Policy Index (SRPI) and the Support and Flexibility Policy Index (SFPI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OxCGRT has appeared in multiple studies (eMethods and eTable 1 in Supplement 1). To distinguish policy purposes, we recategorized OxCGRT components into 2 new indexes: the Stringency and Restrictive Policy Index (SRPI) and the Support and Flexibility Policy Index (SFPI).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such state-level differences have been associated with differences in COVID-19 related outcomes. For example, levels of depression and anxiety have been positively associated with stringency of lockdown policies; however, this relationship varied geographically as a factor of state-level economic support ( Yao et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It helps remove barriers to financial capital flows and creates an equitable financial environment, which enables disadvantaged groups to improve their social environment through access to high-quality financial services [ 39 ]. It helps disadvantaged groups to obtain equitable rights and improves workers’ self-esteem and self-motivation, thus improving their mental health [ 40 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%