2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loci for insulin processing and secretion provide insight into type 2 diabetes risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We noted substantial agreement between DEGAS and RePACT, for example the transcription factor SIX3 was enriched in T2D-β obese-DEGAS cells and in Fang et al’s obese trajectory β-cells 5 . SIX3 has been implicated as a diabetes risk gene and is important for β-cell function 44, 45 . Additionally, both approaches highlighted the association of DLK1 with obesity, but only DEGAS identified DLK1 association with T2D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We noted substantial agreement between DEGAS and RePACT, for example the transcription factor SIX3 was enriched in T2D-β obese-DEGAS cells and in Fang et al’s obese trajectory β-cells 5 . SIX3 has been implicated as a diabetes risk gene and is important for β-cell function 44, 45 . Additionally, both approaches highlighted the association of DLK1 with obesity, but only DEGAS identified DLK1 association with T2D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary MR analysis was only performed for antidiabetic drugs that demonstrated expected associations with these positive control outcomes. Details about genetic association data for these positive control outcomes, e.g., sample size, inclusion/exclusion criteria, covariates, are listed in Table 1 [29,30,[33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Age, sex and PCs [ 17 ] Positive control outcomes T2DM Participants from 18 studies 26,676 cases/ 132,532 controls (NA) Self-reported diabetes diagnosed by a physician, self-reported antidiabetic drug use, fasting-glucose ≥ 7.0mmol/L, non-fasting glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥ 6.5%, a diagnosis of diabetes in the hospital discharge register Age, sex and PCs [ 33 ] HOMA-IR Participants from 20 studies 36,466 Individuals with diagnosed type-1 or type-2 diabetes, with fasting glucose ≥ 7.0mmol/L, on diabetes treatment, with pregnancy, with outliers ± 3 s.d. ; non-fasting individuals HOMA-IR=(fasting insulin [mU/L] × fasting glucose [nmol/L]) × 22.5 Age, sex, study site, geographic covariates and age squared [ 34 ] Fasting proinsulin Participants from 16 studies 45,861 Individuals with self-reported or diagnosed diabetes, antidiabetic drug use, fasting-glucose ≥ 7.0mmol/L, 2-hour glucose ≥ 11.1 mmol/L, HbA1c ≥ 6.5% (NA) Age, sex, PCs and other study-specific covariates [ 36 ] BMI* Participants from 125 studies 322,154 Individuals with missing information (including weight, height, BMI, age or sex), with age < 18 years Self-reported or measured height and weight. BMI = weight (kg) / height (m) 2 Age, age squared and study-specific covariates such as PCs [ 29 ] Hip circumference* Participants from 57 studies 213,038 Individuals with missing information (including hip circumference, weight, height, BMI, age or sex), with age < 18 years Self-reported or measured metrics …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original GWAS consisted solely of individuals from the European population. The MAGIC GWAS involved a total of 55,172, 55,535, and 45,826 participants for insulin fold change, insulin sensitivity index, and fasting proinsulin values, respectively [10,11]. And data of fasting insulin, fasting glucose, 2-hour glucose and glycated haemoglobin was obtained from a total of 281,416 participants.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%