Locations for screw fixation beyond the glenoid vault for fixation of glenoid implants into the scapula: An anatomic study

Codsi, Michael J.; Bennetts, Craig; Powell, Kimerly; Iannotti, Joseph P.

doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.07.009

Cited by 29 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Hamann-Todd Human Osteological Collection at the Cleveland Museum of Natural History has 2,967 skeletal specimens. This collection has previously been examined in multiple published orthopedic studies [22] [23] [24]. One hundred and twenty (sixty male and sixty female) randomly collected pelvic specimens (240 hips), including the corresponding sacrums, were inspected.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender and Racial Differences in Focal and Global Acetabular Version

Tannenbaum

Kopydlowski

Smith

et al. 2014

The Journal of Arthroplasty

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to compare the acetabular version between male and female pelvises. We hypothesized that female acetabula would demonstrate more retroversion because Pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is associated with acetabular retroversion, which is more commonly observed in females. 120 bony pelvic specimens were randomly collected. The version was measured at three different axial sections of each acetabuli: cranial, central, and caudal. Males demonstrated significantly less anteversion than females in every section. The global version (the average of all three measurements) was also significantly different between males and females (16°±7° and 19°±8° respectively, p<0.001). Of the 240 examined acetabuli, 21 demonstrated cranial retroversion (16 males & 5 females). The data showed no significant difference (p=0.353) between global version of African Americans (18°±9°) and Caucasians (17°±7°). The results of this study suggest that symptomatic FAI in the female population likely reflects a complex interplay of femoral and acetabular dysmorphology and cannot be explained by differences in acetabular version alone.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gender and Racial Differences in Focal and Global Acetabular Version

Tannenbaum

Kopydlowski

Smith

et al. 2014

The Journal of Arthroplasty

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The screw originated from the glenoid surface and was directed toward the spine of the scapula, the base of the coracoid, or the scapular pillar. 4,12 The screw had to remain entirely in bone for the placement area to be considered a viable spot for insertion. Furthermore, the glenoid was divided into superior, inferior, anterior and posterior quadrants ( Figure 3) by intersection of the glenoid surface and 2 orthogonal planes, which were 45 rotation of the x-z and y-z planes around the z-axis.…”

Section: Peripheral Screw Placementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Glenoid morphology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Classification and surgical implications

Frankle

Teramoto

Luo

et al. 2009

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

198

128

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…5,12 While the findings from these previous studies are valuable for refining clinical practice to date, there is still a need for clear guidelines for screw placement based on a comprehensive, 3-dimensional (3-D) analysis of bone quality, particularly as it relates to particular orientations that are achievable with common glenoid base plate designs.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%