2000
DOI: 10.3133/ofr00154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locations and ages of middle Tertiary volcanic centers in coastal California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He divided these volcanic rocks into three age and geographic groups, namely, a mid‐Tertiary group with ages 27–22 Ma located primarily in central California; a mid‐Miocene group with ages 18–12 Ma primarily in southern California; and a post‐mid‐Miocene group with ages younger than 15 Ma showing a northward younging age progression through central and northern California. Our compilation of well‐determined ages (Table 1 and Figure 1, simplified from Stanley et al [2000]) includes numerous recently published dates not available for previous compilations. We find it useful to subdivide Dickinson's mid‐Tertiary group into an older group with ages 27–25 Ma that occurs within and slightly north of the Transverse Ranges, and a younger group with ages 24–22 Ma that extends well to the north.…”
Section: Volcanic Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He divided these volcanic rocks into three age and geographic groups, namely, a mid‐Tertiary group with ages 27–22 Ma located primarily in central California; a mid‐Miocene group with ages 18–12 Ma primarily in southern California; and a post‐mid‐Miocene group with ages younger than 15 Ma showing a northward younging age progression through central and northern California. Our compilation of well‐determined ages (Table 1 and Figure 1, simplified from Stanley et al [2000]) includes numerous recently published dates not available for previous compilations. We find it useful to subdivide Dickinson's mid‐Tertiary group into an older group with ages 27–25 Ma that occurs within and slightly north of the Transverse Ranges, and a younger group with ages 24–22 Ma that extends well to the north.…”
Section: Volcanic Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Map showing approximate locations of late Oligocene through middle Miocene volcanic centers in coastal California (modified from Stanley et al [2000]). See Table 1 for explanation of letter symbols.…”
Section: Volcanic Recordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinos block were also structurally high during late Oligocene and Miocene time. Synextensional deposition was accompanied by emplacement of mostly basaltic flows and sills [ Stanley et al , 2000; Kellogg , 2003] that have K‐Ar ages ranging from 20.9 to 26.5 Ma [ Frizzell and Wegand , 1993]. This volcanic episode marks a period of late Oligocene‐early Miocene crustal extension coeval with clockwise block rotation farther south [ Hornafius et al , 1986].…”
Section: Late Oligocene To Recent Geologic Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation is older than the unconformably overlying Quail Lake Formation, a unit that contains upper Miocene fossils, but isotopic ages of the severely altered volcanic rocks themselves remain ambiguous. An age of between 24 and 21 Ma from potassium-argon investigations is probable (Turner et al, 1970;Barrows et al, 1985;Weigand and Thomas, 1989;Weigand and Swisher, 1991;Dickinson, 1997;Stanley et al, 2000). The remarkable similarity of the volcanic sequence, (including its petrography and chemical composition, and its interpreted age) to the sequence in the Pinnacles area of central California leads to the conclusion that the Neenach and Pinnacles volcanic fields were one and the same before disruption and disOverview of rocks bordering Ridge Basin, southern California placement by the San Andreas of 300-315 km (Matthews, 1973(Matthews, , 1976Weigand and Thomas, 1989;Frizzell and Weigand, 1993;Stanley et al, 2000).…”
Section: Neenach Volcanic Formationmentioning
confidence: 96%