Location patterns of urban industry in Shanghai and implications for sustainability

Abstract

China's economy has undergone rapid transition and industrial restructuring. The term "urban industry" describes a particular type of industry within Chinese cities experiencing restructuring. Given the high percentage of industrial firms that have either closed or relocated from city centres to the urban fringe and beyond, emergent global cities such as Shanghai, are implementing strategies for local economic and urban development, which involve urban industrial upgrading numerous firms in the city centre and urban fringe. This study aims to analyze the location patterns of seven urban industrial sectors within the Shanghai urban region using 2008 micro-geography data. To avoid Modifiable Areal Unit Problem (MAUP) issue, four distance-based measures including nearest neighbourhood analysis, Kernel density estimation, K-function and co-location quotient have been extensively applied to analyze and compare the concentration and co-location between the seven sectors. The results reveal disparate patterns varying with distance and interesting co-location as well. The results are as follows: the city centre and the urban fringe have the highest intensity of urban industrial firms, but the zones with 20-30 km from the city centre is a watershed for most categories; the degree of concentration varies with distance, weaker at shorter distance, increasing up to the maximum distance of 30 km and then decreasing until 50 km; for all urban industries, there are three types of patterns, mixture of clustered, random and dispersed distribution at a varied range of distances. Consequently, this paper argues that the location pattern of urban industry reflects the stage-specific industrial restructuring and spatial transformation, conditioned by sustainability objectives.

Research on Tibetan Folk’s Contemporary Tibetan Cultural Adaptive Differences and Its Influencing Factors—Taking ShigatseCity, Tibet, China as an Example

“…As a result, the Tibetans' had profound religious sentiment and spiritual sustenance for Tibetan Buddhism, and at the same time, the Tibetan people formed the behavioral characteristics and cognitive styles based on naturalism and transcendent symbolism [11]. Since the 1950's democratic reform in Tibet, Tibetan people have overthrown the local serf system, establishing the development path of socialism with Chinese and Tibetan characteristics, which effectively promoted economic development, social progress, and cultural transformation [84]. Especially since the reform and opening up, Tibet's development, stability, and opening up have enabled foreign culture, modern culture, and post-modern culture to infiltrate all aspects of Tibetan people's work and life, and promoted the slow evolution of Tibetan traditional local culture, leading to the gradual emergence of new local cultures.…”

The Evolution of Industrial Agglomerations and Specialization in the Yangtze River Delta from 1990–2018: An Analysis Based on Firm-Level Big Data

“…In terms of research methods, scholars have designed numerous indexes to measure industrial agglomeration and specialization. To determine whether these indexes have spatial dimensions and whether they can provide statistical tests, these indicators can be divided into three generations [38,39]. The first-generation indicators include the Location quotient [40], the Gini coefficient, the Theil indices [41], the Coefficient of variation, the Diversification index [12], the Entropy indices [35], etc.…”

“…Such indicators which are represented by the Ellison-Glaeser index, which can not only take the spatial dimension of industrial agglomeration into account, but also can study these issues on a finer spatial scale by using firm-level data. However, the Ellison-Glaeser index can be used to measure industrial agglomeration at a single spatial scale and cannot take the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP) into consideration [39]. The third generation indicators are distance-based measures, which include the Duranton-Overman index [3], Ripley's k-functions [44], space-time k-functions [28,30], G function [45], M function [46], and D function [47].…”

“…In addition, there is another class of methods that combines the first-generation non-spatial indicators indexes (such as Location Quotient, Gini coefficient, etc.) and modern spatial statistical methods, such as Moran's I or Getis-Ord Gi* [48][49][50], as well as nuclear density analysis [39] to study the spatial evolution of industrial agglomeration and specialization. For example, Carroll et al (2008) used both location quotients and Gi* to explore the potential cluster regions in the transportation equipment industry [51].…”

Exploration of the Industrial Spatial Linkages in Urban Agglomerations: A Case of Urban Agglomeration in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River, China

“…Previous literature on industrial spatial linkages has yielded substantial achievements [12,15,20,21]. However, researches engaged in this work have not formed a complete framework.…”