1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00740288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location of the sonic transition behind a detonation front

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrodynamic thickness was estimated from both experimental and numerical studies. In experimental studies, the bow shock technique (Vasil'ev et al 1972;Weber & Olivier 2003) or the decay of the pressure signal (Edwards, Jones & Phillips 1976;Jarsalé, Virot & Chinnayya 2016) were used. Its estimation in numerical studies were determined by averaging the flow field Radulescu et al 2007) or by shortening the computational domain until the effect of the rarefactions of the Taylor wave were no more effective (Gamezo, Desbordes & Oran 1999b;Mi et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydrodynamic thickness was estimated from both experimental and numerical studies. In experimental studies, the bow shock technique (Vasil'ev et al 1972;Weber & Olivier 2003) or the decay of the pressure signal (Edwards, Jones & Phillips 1976;Jarsalé, Virot & Chinnayya 2016) were used. Its estimation in numerical studies were determined by averaging the flow field Radulescu et al 2007) or by shortening the computational domain until the effect of the rarefactions of the Taylor wave were no more effective (Gamezo, Desbordes & Oran 1999b;Mi et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experimental studies, the bow shock technique (Vasil'ev et al. 1972; Weber & Olivier 2003) or the decay of the pressure signal (Edwards, Jones & Phillips 1976; Jarsalé, Virot & Chinnayya 2016) were used. Its estimation in numerical studies were determined by averaging the flow field (Lee & Radulescu 2005; Radulescu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%