1982
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.1982.350455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location of Spaceborne Sar Imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
107
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
107
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Tables 2-6, it can be concluded that the proposed localization method has a higher quality of accuracy and can obtain targets' height information compared with that proposed in [11,12]. Table 7.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to Tables 2-6, it can be concluded that the proposed localization method has a higher quality of accuracy and can obtain targets' height information compared with that proposed in [11,12]. Table 7.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a contrast, the localization result proposed in [11,12] with the same parameters in Table 1 is listed in Table 7. Since it is monostatic SAR, the location and velocity of the first transmitter parameter are used here.…”
Section: Discussion and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The geometric correction method, based on whether it takes use of control points (CP), can be divided into two main categories: the method based on imaging model [2][3][4][5] and the method based on SAR image simulation [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%