2011 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems Engineering (CASE) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iccase.2011.5997582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location Finding in Wireless Sensor Network Based on Soft Computing Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 shows a comparison of the proposed hybrid PSO-ANN algorithm with other artificial intelligent algorithms employed for outdoor and indoor wireless SN localization in other studies. The results reveal that the location estimated using the hybrid PSO-ANN algorithm outperforms the algorithms of previous studies [33,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] in terms of MAE.…”
Section: Hybrid Pso-ann Algorithm For Distance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Figure 10 shows a comparison of the proposed hybrid PSO-ANN algorithm with other artificial intelligent algorithms employed for outdoor and indoor wireless SN localization in other studies. The results reveal that the location estimated using the hybrid PSO-ANN algorithm outperforms the algorithms of previous studies [33,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] in terms of MAE.…”
Section: Hybrid Pso-ann Algorithm For Distance Estimationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We have utilized SA as described in [15] a search method to explore the restoration space comprising of a set of alternative WSN topologies with various lifespans. (1) and (2). Hereby, the parameter …”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed ANN localization technique can be compared with several studies that adopted different soft computing localization techniques in terms of MAE, such as particle bacterial foraging algorithm (BFA) and PSO [104], ANN [64,[105][106][107][108][109], gravitational search algorithm hybrid with neural network (GSA-ANN) [26], PSO hybrid with neural network (PSO-ANN) [63,110], quantum swarm optimization (QPSO) [111], neuro-fuzzy (NF) and genetic fuzzy (GF) [112], and extreme learning machine (ELM) [113] for indoor environments, as shown in Figure 26. The performance of the current work in terms of MAE is achieved based on the methodology that has been presented in Section 3.2 through 3.5, and this is validated by simulation implementation (Section 3.2) and simulation results (Section 5.2) for LOS and NLOS environments.…”
Section: Comparison Of Localization Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, the proposed FDS based on DDA outperforms previous systems in terms of battery life, which is extended to 1480 h (62 days), as shown in Figure 27. Proposed ANN (LOS) [104],BFA Proposed ANN (NLOS) [104],PSO [105], ANN [106],ANN [26],GSA-ANN [63],PSO-ANN [111 ],QPSO [110],PSO-ANN [107],ANN [108],ANN [112],NF [112],GF [109],ANN [64],ANN [113],ELM MAE (m) Figure 26. Comparison between MAE of the proposed ANN technique and previous techniques.…”
Section: Power Consumption Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%