Proceedings. 2005 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/wcnm.2005.1544300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Location database clustering to achieve location management time cost reduction in a mobile computing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dis(cur_RA(x), cur_RA(y)): The distance between mobile users x and y. Therefore, dis(x,y)= dis(cur_RA(x), cur_RA(y)) When calculating the location management cost, as in [1,3], we consider the following related costs in location update and the lookup procedure: L: The cost of following a link in the tree of the location databases, i.e., sending a message to the parent or the child node of a location database. U: The cost of a database update.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…dis(cur_RA(x), cur_RA(y)): The distance between mobile users x and y. Therefore, dis(x,y)= dis(cur_RA(x), cur_RA(y)) When calculating the location management cost, as in [1,3], we consider the following related costs in location update and the lookup procedure: L: The cost of following a link in the tree of the location databases, i.e., sending a message to the parent or the child node of a location database. U: The cost of a database update.…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the topology of the location databases can affects the location management cost greatly. According to the more detailed example given by [3], by switching the position of LDB responsible for RA 5 and LDB responsible for RA 7 with each other, the location update cost saving can achieve 300L+300U.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations