“…Plantation studies have focused on the ways that the manipulation of space was influenced by the environment and intended to increase production and maintain surveillance over enslaved laborers (Singleton, 2001). Additional studies have assessed the ways in which enslaved people created their own spaces within these settings (Armstrong and Kelly, 2000; Flewellen, 2017; LaRoche, 2014; McKittrick, 2011; Weik, 2012). Further investigations have addressed aspects of water on plantations, including drinking water and exchange via watercraft and wharves (Harris, 2014; Hauser, 2017; McKinnon, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary work in plantation studies is one body of literature that has sought to highlight the agency of enslaved individuals in the context of violent landscapes. For example, Ayana Omilade Flewellen (2017) has critiqued dominant plantation perspectives as primarily oriented towards that of the white, male planter as a means of creating a cohesive historical narrative for public consumption. This manifests in bounded spaces, which present the plantation mistress in domestic settings, enslaved inhabitants in domestic and labor settings, and the male plantation owner everywhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Mark Hauser (2017: 229) has noted that “water is a tool of ‘management’ linked to states and the consolidation of power,” his work primarily focuses on the idea of Caribbean plantation waterways through drinking water, and points to navigable waterways as a future avenue of research. Many plantation studies (Battle-Baptiste, 2010; Ferguson, 1992; Flewellen, 2017; Hauser, 2011; Hauser and Armstrong 2012; Lenik, 2011; Meier, 2012; Singleton, 2001; Skipper, 2016; Spencer-Wood, 2010; Weik, 2012; Wilkie, 2000) have focused on how landscapes both represent and reinforce power structures, noting that the particular plantation layouts were influenced by the ideologies of the societies that built them as well as their natural environments. While studies of the natural environment have investigated agriculture, terrestrial mobility, disease, and “the spaces between,” they have not addressed landscapes of movement across and through the water (Bates et al., 2016; Swanson, 2012).…”
Section: Waterways and The Built Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship in plantation studies has engaged with "black geographies" and "geographies of resistance" to critically assess the ways that enslaved and free people experienced shared geographical spaces in vastly different ways (see for example : Flewellen, 2017;LaRoche, 2014;McKittrick, 2011;Weik, 2012). At the same time, there has been an interest in the ways human-environment interactions co-create landscapes, with different degrees of agency (see for example : Bennett, 2010;Haraway, 2007;Jones and Alberti, 2013;Mitchell, 2002;Tsing, 2015).…”
Section: Waterways and The Built Environmentmentioning
Navigable waterways were essential to European colonization of the South Carolina Lowcountry beginning in the late 17th century. Despite early attempts by colonial leaders to keep land grants within close proximity to Charleston, colonists quickly began to establish plantations where the land was amenable for commodity production and scattered throughout the region. Consequently, colonists and enslaved individuals utilized navigable waterways by extending the built environment into the water through wharves, landings, and watercraft, as well as modifying the waterways themselves for irrigation, agriculture, and mobility. Despite the importance of waterways in the function of plantations, most landscape studies have focused on terrestrial contexts. This paper proposes that waterway assemblages should be integrated into plantation landscape studies as a means of understanding the role of movement in commodity production, surveillance, and communication to better reconstruct everyday life, focusing on the preliminary remote sensing fieldwork of two antebellum plantation waterfronts as case studies.
“…Plantation studies have focused on the ways that the manipulation of space was influenced by the environment and intended to increase production and maintain surveillance over enslaved laborers (Singleton, 2001). Additional studies have assessed the ways in which enslaved people created their own spaces within these settings (Armstrong and Kelly, 2000; Flewellen, 2017; LaRoche, 2014; McKittrick, 2011; Weik, 2012). Further investigations have addressed aspects of water on plantations, including drinking water and exchange via watercraft and wharves (Harris, 2014; Hauser, 2017; McKinnon, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interdisciplinary work in plantation studies is one body of literature that has sought to highlight the agency of enslaved individuals in the context of violent landscapes. For example, Ayana Omilade Flewellen (2017) has critiqued dominant plantation perspectives as primarily oriented towards that of the white, male planter as a means of creating a cohesive historical narrative for public consumption. This manifests in bounded spaces, which present the plantation mistress in domestic settings, enslaved inhabitants in domestic and labor settings, and the male plantation owner everywhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Mark Hauser (2017: 229) has noted that “water is a tool of ‘management’ linked to states and the consolidation of power,” his work primarily focuses on the idea of Caribbean plantation waterways through drinking water, and points to navigable waterways as a future avenue of research. Many plantation studies (Battle-Baptiste, 2010; Ferguson, 1992; Flewellen, 2017; Hauser, 2011; Hauser and Armstrong 2012; Lenik, 2011; Meier, 2012; Singleton, 2001; Skipper, 2016; Spencer-Wood, 2010; Weik, 2012; Wilkie, 2000) have focused on how landscapes both represent and reinforce power structures, noting that the particular plantation layouts were influenced by the ideologies of the societies that built them as well as their natural environments. While studies of the natural environment have investigated agriculture, terrestrial mobility, disease, and “the spaces between,” they have not addressed landscapes of movement across and through the water (Bates et al., 2016; Swanson, 2012).…”
Section: Waterways and The Built Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent scholarship in plantation studies has engaged with "black geographies" and "geographies of resistance" to critically assess the ways that enslaved and free people experienced shared geographical spaces in vastly different ways (see for example : Flewellen, 2017;LaRoche, 2014;McKittrick, 2011;Weik, 2012). At the same time, there has been an interest in the ways human-environment interactions co-create landscapes, with different degrees of agency (see for example : Bennett, 2010;Haraway, 2007;Jones and Alberti, 2013;Mitchell, 2002;Tsing, 2015).…”
Section: Waterways and The Built Environmentmentioning
Navigable waterways were essential to European colonization of the South Carolina Lowcountry beginning in the late 17th century. Despite early attempts by colonial leaders to keep land grants within close proximity to Charleston, colonists quickly began to establish plantations where the land was amenable for commodity production and scattered throughout the region. Consequently, colonists and enslaved individuals utilized navigable waterways by extending the built environment into the water through wharves, landings, and watercraft, as well as modifying the waterways themselves for irrigation, agriculture, and mobility. Despite the importance of waterways in the function of plantations, most landscape studies have focused on terrestrial contexts. This paper proposes that waterway assemblages should be integrated into plantation landscape studies as a means of understanding the role of movement in commodity production, surveillance, and communication to better reconstruct everyday life, focusing on the preliminary remote sensing fieldwork of two antebellum plantation waterfronts as case studies.
“…For example, the discovery of the New York African Burial Ground illuminated the hidden slave past in the northern United States and transformed archaeological practice with the demand that practitioners share intellectual power with descendant community members (LaRoche and Blakey ). In addition, the studies of enslaved quarters on plantations like Rich Neck (Virginia), Carter's Grove (Virginia), Poplar Forest (Virginia), the Hermitage (Tennessee), and Kingsley Plantation (Florida) uncovered important evidence of the nature of Black cultural resistance by highlighting the ways that enslaved Blacks transformed foodways or the natural landscape to both preserve and transmit their African roots (Battle ; Battle‐Baptiste ; Davidson ; Fairbanks ; Flewellen ; Franklin , ; Heath and Gary ; McKee ; Mrozowski, Franklin, and Hunt ; Thomas ). Scholars also highlighted the ways that material culture became entangled in processes of racialization and, hence, indicative of racism, racial formation, ethnogenesis, cultural change and retention, or unequivocal acts of resistance like marronage (Bell ; Epperson ; Ferguson ; Leone, LaRoche, and Babiarz ; Mullins ; Sayers ; Weik ).…”
Section: The Rise Of African Diaspora Archaeologymentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.