Locating Globalization: Feminist (Re)readings of the Subjects and Spaces of Globalization

Abstract

The literatures on economic globalization and feminist understandings of global processes have largely remained separate. In this article, our goal is to bring them into productive conversation so that research on globalization can benefit from feminist engagements with globalization. In the first section, which focuses on the conceptual challenges of bringing the economic globalization literature into conversation with feminist analysis, we identify several key exclusions in that literature and propose parallel inclusions that a feminist reading of globalization suggests. Our suggested inclusions relate to the spaces, scales, subjects, and forms of work that research on economic globalization has largely neglected. The second section takes up several key themes in the large body of feminist research on global economic processes, which is also largely absent from the economic globalization literature: the gendering of work, gender and structural adjustment programs, and mobility and diaspora. In the final section, we address the implications of feminist epistemologies and methodologies for research on economic globalization. Here we argue for grounded, collaborative studies that incorporate perspectives of the south as well as the north and that construct understandings of place and the local, as well as space and general global processes; we point to the coconstitution of different geographic scales and highlight the need for studies that cut across them. The article demonstrates how a feminist analysis of globalization entails far more than recognizing the importance of gender; it requires substantial rethinking of how to conceptualize, study, and act in relation to economic globalization. 257* The authors collaborated fully in conceptualizing, writing, and revising this article, and we wish to acknowledge the pleasures and enrichments of this collaboration. Following an ancient feminist custom, we chose to list the authors in order of age. We thank the reviewers and David Angel for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

Shifting conceptualizations of ethical consumption: Cause-related marketing in India and the USA

“…This requires a conceptualization of local-global processes that maintains the uniqueness of the local context while seeing it as interconnected to other places. Inspiration for this task can be found in the work of feminist economic geographers and their theorization of globalization (e.g., Nagar et al, 2002). In particular the concept of countertopographies is useful here.…”

“…Her work is mirrored in the ideas of other feminist geographers who argue for an approach to globalization that is simultaneously global and intimate (rather than either global or intimate). They call for an examination of how global processes play out on and are practiced by individual bodies in particular places (e.g., Mullings, 2009;Nagar et al, 2002;Pratt and Rosner, 2006).…”

Women and the access to knowledge and new technologies: The case of Pisa

“…The spatial dimension of technological change should not be neglected because it links global change with local potential (Nagar et al, 2002). Access to knowledge and technology constitutes an enormous potential for participation in the local-global dynamics for women as well.…”

“Our Public Library”: Social reproduction and urban public space in Toronto

“…As geographers Peck and Tickell (2002) have observed, "neoliberalism seems to be everywhere", but they argue that most geographers' studies of neoliberalism proceed through overly specified, localized, institutionally-bounded accounts that have a limited analytical reach toward the extralocal features of neoliberalism. By contrast, feminist geographers have asserted that "local" is intimately and constitutively global, particularly when marketization and neoliberal state restructuring weigh heavily on everyday life (Katz, 2001b;Mountz & Hyndman, 2006;Nagar, Lawson, McDowell, & Hanson, 2002). Feminist political geographers have also argued that most geographers' studies of urban neoliberalism and state restructuring do not adequately account for or theorize social reproduction (Marston, 2000), though some employ the term to describe struggles over social services, everyday survival, and labor market policies (Heynen, 2009;Jonas & Ward, 2007).…”