2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6247895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Orderless Tracking

Abstract: Locally Orderless Tracking (LOT) is a visual tracking algorithm that automatically estimates the amount of local (dis)order in the object. This lets the tracker specialize in both rigid and deformable objects on-line and with no prior assumptions. We provide a probabilistic model of the object variations over time. The model is implemented using the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD) with two parameters that control the cost of moving pixels and changing their color. We adjust these costs on-line during tracking to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most stateof-the-art methods rely on solely image intensity information [17,31,8,14,35,20,7], while others employ simple color space transformations [29,27,28]. On the contrary, feature representations have been thoroughly investigated in the related fields of object recognition and action recognition [22,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most stateof-the-art methods rely on solely image intensity information [17,31,8,14,35,20,7], while others employ simple color space transformations [29,27,28]. On the contrary, feature representations have been thoroughly investigated in the related fields of object recognition and action recognition [22,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare our proposed feature representation with 15 state of the art trackers: CT [35], TLD [20], DFT [31], EDFT [8], ASLA [18], L1APG [2], CSK [17], SCM [36], LOT [28], CPF [29], CXT [7], Frag [1], Struck [14], LSHT [15] and LSST [32]. Table 2 shows the comparison of our tracker with the state-of-the-art tracking methods using median DP, OP and CLE.…”
Section: Experiments 2: State Of the Art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. These trackers include Struck [8], SCM [45], TLD [15], ASLA [14], VTD [17], VTS [18], CXT [4], LSK [24], CSK [10], MTT [44] and LOT [27]. Note that all the plots are automatically generated by the code library supported by the benchmark providers.…”
Section: Experiments 1: Cvpr2013 Visual Tracker Benchmarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed E-RBPF model is compared to 4 state-of-the-art tracking techniques including: a) Generic RBPF tracker (G-RBPF) for multiple target tracking [34], b) a Probabilistic Data Association particle Filtering (PDAF) technique for multiple object tracking proposed in [35], c) an extended version of the context tracking (CT) algorithm proposed in [36] and c) the locally orderless tracking (LOT) from [37]. The relevance of these baseline trackers to the proposed E-RBPF model can be described as follows.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%