2017
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2017.2691730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Linear Embedding on Grassmann Manifold for Performance Degradation Assessment of Bearings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first block in TABLE II lists the results from the classical machine learning methods, the random forest (RF) [32] and support vector machine (SVM) [33]. Especially for SVM, we adopted three different forms of input signals, i) the raw signals of length 2048, ii) 29 statistical features of time and frequency domain extracted by Ma et al [34], and iii) the same manually extracted features but the signals are decomposed into 8 components by the wavelet packet (sym4) before feature extraction. However, according to the result, it is implicit that SVM and RF can not recognize the raw signals well (the accuracies are 53.48% and 64.66%, respectively), and even with the help of WPD and manual feature extraction, it is not improved much (less than 5%).…”
Section: A Defect Classification With Sufficient Labeled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first block in TABLE II lists the results from the classical machine learning methods, the random forest (RF) [32] and support vector machine (SVM) [33]. Especially for SVM, we adopted three different forms of input signals, i) the raw signals of length 2048, ii) 29 statistical features of time and frequency domain extracted by Ma et al [34], and iii) the same manually extracted features but the signals are decomposed into 8 components by the wavelet packet (sym4) before feature extraction. However, according to the result, it is implicit that SVM and RF can not recognize the raw signals well (the accuracies are 53.48% and 64.66%, respectively), and even with the help of WPD and manual feature extraction, it is not improved much (less than 5%).…”
Section: A Defect Classification With Sufficient Labeled Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2017) extended the traditional mathematical morphological particle (MMP), which responds to bearing performance degradation, to a general MMP (GMMP) based on mathematical morphology theory to improve the reliability of bearing performance degradation assessment. Ma et al (2017) proposed a new manifold learning Glasmann manifold-locally linear embedding (LLE) method based on LLE, which can better capture the nonlinear and dynamic information in equipment vibration data. Zhang et al (2017) used short-time Fourier transform (STFT) with nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) to generate time-frequency features and constructed more sensitive health indicators (HIs) of bearing performance degradation using SOM networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of using purely data-driven methods, we principally embed well-known physical principles into the recurrent neural networks. As stated in [13], the degradation process of mechanical systems is monotonic, which means that components can't heal without repairing. Thus, an ideal degradation indicator should be monotonic over time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%