2012
DOI: 10.1021/la300972j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Enhanced Dissolution Rate as a Probe for Nanocontact-Induced Densification in Oxide Glasses

Abstract: Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to characterize the surface damage (nanoindentations) effect on the chemical durability of glass surfaces (silica and soda-lime silicate glasses, WG). In basic solutions, an enhanced dissolution rate is reported and quantified at indentation sites (+10.5 nm/h and +52 nm/h for silica and WG, respectively) whereas none was observed once the indented surfaces were thermally annealed at 0.9 × T(g) for 2 h, a thermal treatment known for curing high pressure-induced permanent d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the slightly asymmetric geometry and the boundary conditions at the top and bottom of the pillar, strong strain gradients are predicted. In view of the small size of the sample, experimental mapping of these gradients is a presently insuperable challenge for local characterization methods [23,32,20]. The calculated densification distributions are plotted in 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the slightly asymmetric geometry and the boundary conditions at the top and bottom of the pillar, strong strain gradients are predicted. In view of the small size of the sample, experimental mapping of these gradients is a presently insuperable challenge for local characterization methods [23,32,20]. The calculated densification distributions are plotted in 11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many investigations dealing with silica micro-plasticity have been carried out with high hydrostatic pressure experiments [30,13]; they are very useful, but lack the necessary shear contribution. It has also been proposed to use the indentation-induced densification field, which can be measured by Raman scattering [23,31], or by silica dissolution experiments [32], but there are discrepancies between these data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Astonishingly, the entire cavity has recovered above the glass surface, with substantial amount of protrusion surrounding the point of indenter contact. [42] By placing a small indent close to the edge of a pre-existing larger indent, Gross and Tomozawa showed that hardness depends on the fictive temperature of the glass, and that the magnitude of the change in hardness depends on the chemical composition of the glass. This behavior suggests that swelling, presumably linked to atomic-scale reorganization of the structure, is occurring.…”
Section: Volume Recovery Of Indentation Cavitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emerging demand for stronger and lighter car windshields and other novel transparent structural materials further stimulates a need for deeper understanding and improvement of glass strengthening techniques. Studies of contact cracking (Lawn and Wilshaw, 1975;Ostojic and McPherson, 1987;Cook and Pharr, 1990) date back at least one century (Johnson, 1985;Lawn, 1998) and tremendous progress has been achieved to understand the shear flow, densification, and cracking under indentation in brittle solids (Lawn and Swain, 1975;Lawn and Wilshaw, 1975;Marshall and Lawn, 1978;Hagan, 1979;Lawn et al, 1983;Johnson, 1985;Ostojic and McPherson, 1987;Cook and Pharr, 1990;Lawn, 1998Lawn, , 2004Perriot et al, 2006;Gross and Tomozawa, 2008a,b,c;Gross et al, 2009;Kato et al, 2010;Gross, 2012a;Kassir-Bodon et al, 2012;Niu et al, 2012;Tran et al, 2012;Kjeldsen et al, 2013;Smedskjaer et al, 2013;Striepe et al, 2013b;Aakermann et al, 2015;Rouxel and Yokoyama, 2015). It is commonly believed that the surface strengthening against contact cracking comes from the linear superposition of a compressive stress (CS) profile onto the surface of the glass (Marshall and Lawn, 1978;Lawn and Fuller, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%