Locally defined measures of successful forest co-management: A case study of Tl'azt'en Nation and the John Prince Research Forest.

Arctic Social Indicators

“…As well, the use of indigenous place names has been suggested as an indicator of cultural revitalization by at least one indigenous (though not Arctic) group, with resultant measures including the "number and/or percentage of maps and signs produced...that are bilingual or primarily use [the indigenous language]" and "the number and/or percentage of maps and signs...that are partially bilingual" (Quinn, 2007). While these local level measures would be difficult to collate, possible measures do exist.…”

Evolving co-management practice: Developing a community-based environmental monitoring framework with Tl'azt'en nation on the John Prince Research Forest.

“…indicators, values, and measures and by utilizing the Tl'azt'en Nation C&I framework (Karjala et al 2004;Sherry et al 2005;Quinn 2007;Fondahl et al 2009 …”

“…Many previous research endeavors have contributed to the Tl'azt'en Nation C&I framework (Booth 1998;Morris 1999;Karjala 2001;Sherry and Fondahl 2003;Karjala et al 2004;Sherry et al 2005;Quinn 2007); however, only the top four hierarchical levels have been developed with a specific environmental focus. Through the development of Tl'azt'en environmental measures, the local-level C&I framework will be further realized.…”

“…Contributing to this C&I framework, Quinn's (2007) thesis research developed Tl'azt'en measures of cultural revitalization for the JPRF.…”

“…Tl'azt'en Nation, UNBC, and the JPRF (Booth 1998;Morris 1999;Karjala 2001;Sherry and Fondahl 2003;Karjala et al 2004;Sherry et al 2005;Quinn 2007). Booth 's (1998; 2000) research with Tl'azt'en Nation investigated First Nation community forestry and initiated many research projects concerned with improving…”