CVPR 2011 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2011.5995602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing parts of faces using a consensus of exemplars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
768
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 577 publications
(773 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
768
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the history of facial landmark localisation spans back many decades (Cootes et al , 2001, the ability to accurately recover facial landmarks on in-the-wild images has only become possible in recent years Papandreou and Maragos 2008;Saragih et al 2011;Cao et al 2014). Much of this progress can be attributed to the release of large annotated datasets of facial landmarks (Sagonas et al 2013b, a;Zhu and Ramanan 2012;Le et al 2012;Belhumeur et al 2013;Köstinger et al 2011) and very recently the area of facial landmark localisation has become extremely competitive with recent works including Xiong and De la Torre (2013), Ren et al (2014), Kazemi and Sullivan (2014), Zhu et al (2015), Tzimiropoulos (2015). For a recent evaluation of facial landmark localisation methods the interested reader may refer to the survey by Wang et al (2014) and to the results of the 300 W competition by Sagonas et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the history of facial landmark localisation spans back many decades (Cootes et al , 2001, the ability to accurately recover facial landmarks on in-the-wild images has only become possible in recent years Papandreou and Maragos 2008;Saragih et al 2011;Cao et al 2014). Much of this progress can be attributed to the release of large annotated datasets of facial landmarks (Sagonas et al 2013b, a;Zhu and Ramanan 2012;Le et al 2012;Belhumeur et al 2013;Köstinger et al 2011) and very recently the area of facial landmark localisation has become extremely competitive with recent works including Xiong and De la Torre (2013), Ren et al (2014), Kazemi and Sullivan (2014), Zhu et al (2015), Tzimiropoulos (2015). For a recent evaluation of facial landmark localisation methods the interested reader may refer to the survey by Wang et al (2014) and to the results of the 300 W competition by Sagonas et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fairness, we augment these non-frontal images by a horizontal flip, so that we get the same numbers of left and right images. 300W dataset is mainly made up of images from LFPW [39], HELEN [40], AFW [41] with 68 re-annotated landmarks. The 3148 images from training dataset are selected in our validation.…”
Section: Sign-correlation Partition Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These landmarks were used to drive the annotation process of the AFLW database with regards to facial bounding boxes [26]. Finally, other databases that can be used for training face detection algorithms are the LFPW [199], HELEN [200] and iBUG databases [197], since facial landmark annotations are provided by the database creators.…”
Section: Databases and Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%