2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing human visual gamma-band activity in frequency, time and space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

83
441
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 450 publications
(529 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
83
441
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These locations are consistent with sources in the foveal confluence of the early visual areas V1, V2 and V3 (Dougherty et al, 2003). Taken together with the results of the present study, these observations support the proposition that the amplitude of the evoked EEG gamma-band response is positively related to stimulus size, and probably reflects the size-dependent activation of cortical areas in retinotopic visual cortices (Busch et al, 2004;Hoogenboom et al, 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Stimulus Size On Evoked Gamma Power Ansupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These locations are consistent with sources in the foveal confluence of the early visual areas V1, V2 and V3 (Dougherty et al, 2003). Taken together with the results of the present study, these observations support the proposition that the amplitude of the evoked EEG gamma-band response is positively related to stimulus size, and probably reflects the size-dependent activation of cortical areas in retinotopic visual cortices (Busch et al, 2004;Hoogenboom et al, 2006).…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Stimulus Size On Evoked Gamma Power Ansupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recent EEG and MEG studies located the sources for early gamma-band responses in occipital areas (Gruber et al, , 2008, especially in the posterior ends of the calcarine sulci of the two hemispheres (Hoogenboom et al, 2006). These locations are consistent with sources in the foveal confluence of the early visual areas V1, V2 and V3 (Dougherty et al, 2003).…”
Section: Effects Of Increasing Stimulus Size On Evoked Gamma Power Ansupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Through translational research [Hall et al, 2005], gamma oscillations have been implicated in human sensory and cognitive function, as well as in neuropsychiatric disease [see Bosman et al, 2014; Phillips and Uhlhaas, 2015; Sedley and Cunningham, 2013, for reviews]. In the magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signal, sustained narrow‐band gamma oscillations are generated in visual cortex in response to simple contrast pattern stimuli [Adjamian et al, 2004; Hoogenboom et al, 2006]. These responses arise from the interaction between local excitatory and inhibitory networks, which are believed to shape the amplitude, as well as the peak frequency of gamma oscillations [Bartos et al, 2007; Gonzalez‐Burgos and Lewis, 2012].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the use of optimally designed experimental paradigms, gamma responses in certain participants can be barely detectable or scarcely quantifiable [Hoogenboom et al, 2006; Muthukumaraswamy et al, 2010]. Therefore, our ability to disentangle the relationship between gamma oscillation frequency and other parameters depends on the accurate and reliable estimation of peak frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have recently begun to adopt multitapers (Thomson, 1982;Percival and Walden, 1993;Mitra and Pesaran, 1999) for EEG analysis Hoogenboom et al, 2006), also see Fig 1b,e. In the multitaper method, the data are multiplied with special windows before the frequency decomposition.…”
Section: Specifications Of Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%